Thanks Ross, I'll try to contact developers
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Ross Gardler <[email protected]>wrote: > As explained in the legal list the compatibility is one way, Apache code in > GPL code. If we include GPL we invoke the reciprocal clauses and thus must > distribute as GPL. > > In practice we often find projects are willing to dual license if we ask > nicely. It depends on why they chose GPL in the first place. > > Sent from a mobile device, please excuse mistakes and brevity > On 25 Apr 2013 07:41, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I disagree > > AFAIK derived means you have changes something and include changed > library > > to your product. > > > > According to the link below: > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.en.html > > > > In addition to clarifying the rules about licenses that are already > > GPL-compatible, GPLv3 is also newly compatible with a few other licenses. > > The Apache License 2.0 is a prime example. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Alexei Fedotov < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > When some product uses a library, the product is derived. > > > -- > > > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > > > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > > > http://dataved.ru/ > > > +7 916 562 8095 > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > [email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > We are going to use their library with no modifications, so this is > not > > > the > > > > case? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Alexei Fedotov > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > >> > This licensing incompatibility applies *only* when some Apache > > project > > > >> software becomes a derivative work of some GPLv3 software, > > > >> > > > >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, > > > >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, > > > >> http://dataved.ru/ > > > >> +7 916 562 8095 > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < > > [email protected] > > > >> >wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > From the link I have already sent: > > > >> > > > > >> > LicensingKendo UI is licensed under GPLv3, which is compatible > with > > > >> Apache > > > >> > License 2.0 > > > >> > > > > >> > GPLv3 is also newly compatible with a few other licenses. The > Apache > > > >> > License 2.0 is a prime example. Lots of great free software is > > > available > > > >> > under this license, with strong communities surrounding it. We > hope > > > that > > > >> > this change in GPLv3 will foster more cooperation and sharing > within > > > the > > > >> > free software community. > > > >> > > > > >> > More info here: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/quick-guide-gplv3.html > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Alexei Fedotov > > > >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > Do they have double licensing? > > > >> > > On Apr 25, 2013 7:30 AM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < > [email protected] > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Project page states: Licence GPLv3 AND Apache compatible > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Alexei Fedotov > > > >> > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > There is though javascript exception in Apache practice > which > > > >> treats > > > >> > > > > javascript as data, thus effectively ignores its license. I > > > think > > > >> we > > > >> > > > better > > > >> > > > > ask on the legal list. > > > >> > > > > On Apr 24, 2013 9:31 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > it is GPLv3 which is Apache compatible > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Alexei Fedotov > > > >> > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I cannot check the license from my phone > > > >> > > > > > > On Apr 24, 2013 4:46 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" < > > > >> > [email protected]> > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I would like to propose these Datetime picker > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > http://www.7thweb.net/wicket-jquery-ui/kendo/datetimepicker/DateTimePickerPage > > > >> > > > > > > > to be used in our Calendar event. and maybe other > > > components > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > pros: > > > >> > > > > > > > 1) it is smooth and jquery based (currently Wicket > uses > > > YUI > > > >> > > > > datepicker) > > > >> > > > > > > > 2) it allows to select both date and time in one > > component > > > >> > > > > > > > 3) it has compatible license > > > >> > > > > > > > 4) it has working demo, so integration will be easy > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > > > > WBR > > > >> > > > > > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > > >> > > > > > WBR > > > >> > > > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > WBR > > > >> > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > WBR > > > >> > Maxim aka solomax > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > WBR > > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
