Folks, 1) the proper server address is demo.dataved.ru; 2) if something does not work, it's Artyom who owns root password at the first place; he reads the lists; 3) the server generally runs 3.0 openmeetings unless Artyom debugs something else.
-- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://dataved.ru/ +7 916 562 8095 On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 10:31 AM, [email protected] < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Artyom, >> >> I think it would be still worth the effort to get that box. There would be >> some limitations in testing and no public sign up I guess. >> However still usefull for testing simple 1:1 meetings. Or for some UI >> testing. >> And it would be good to have at least one server that is owned by the >> community instead of individuals. Individuals come and go as well as might >> be limited in time. But that should be no show stopper for others. >> Sebastian >> Am 07.06.2013 09:12 schrieb "Artyom Horuzhenko" <[email protected]>: >> >> > Hello Sebastian, >> > >> > > There is one at dataved.ru, is that available for public? >> > >> > Server at dataved.ru is still available for everybody except >> > administration >> > privileges. >> > >> > You have a good idea, but as I remember Alexei had already written a >> letter >> > to infrastructure team and they answered that they couldn't afford >> giveing >> > us even 5 mb/s. Unfortunately we can't organize demo with such bad >> channel. >> > 07.06.2013 0:52 пользователь "[email protected]" < >> > [email protected]> >> > написал: >> > > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > what is our current status around demo servers? >> > > There is one at dataved.ru, is that available for public? >> > > >> > > demo.openmeetings.de might not come alive again, the cost for me to >> host >> > > this are too high. >> > > >> > > Also I think it might re-initiate a discussion we had before: >> > > Can we organize a demo server from the Apache infrastructure. >> > > >> > > Not so much as a public demo server to play around, I see it more as a >> > demo >> > > server for developers. For instance it could run a script that does >> > > download and deploy the latest snapshot from Jenkins. Devs coulds then >> > use >> > > that to do some tests, for instance when there is a release upcoming. >> > > >> > > At a later phase we might even discuss some automated tests in the UI >> > using >> > > selenium on that environment. That would advance our quality and >> minimize >> > > the effort of manual testing. >> > > >> > > Any thoughts on this? What was the last status that infra has shared >> with >> > > us about the availability of such a server? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Sebastian >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Sebastian Wagner >> > > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >> > > http://www.webbase-design.de >> > > http://www.wagner-sebastian.com >> > > [email protected] >> > >> > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax
