Alexei, what kind of misleading do you mean? We can't return sip integeration because it had never been removed and Openmeetings sip side works well: Openmeetings succesfully allows red5sip to connect, send it information about sip rooms etc. Audio and video quality is a red5sip issue.
2013/7/2 Alexei Fedotov <[email protected]> > Artyom, IMHO it's a bit late to change. The text you suggest is misleading > anyway. > > If we return integration in 2.1.1, someone should answer for its low > quality. Let's have an improvement in the integration field in 3.0 if the > quality is improved. > 02.07.2013 22:54 пользователь "Artyom Horuzhenko" <[email protected]> > написал: > > > Before changing readme I'd like to know what other people think about > this > > change in readme. > > > > > > 2013/7/2 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > > > > > Hello Artyom, > > > > > > please vote to the dev list > > > > > > According to your comment: I hope it will be the last RC :)) > > > You can add this text to the 3.0.0 README > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Artyom Horuzhenko <[email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > My vote is "+1", but I have some comments about readme. It would be > > > better > > > > if we will change "Video/audio SIP integration is not a part of this > > > Apache > > > > release." to "Red5sip application is not a part of Openmeetings" > > because > > > > Openmeetings contains some sip integeration code and we support it, > but > > > > red5sip had never been a part of Openmeetings. I hope we will be able > > to > > > > rewrite red5sip under Apache license somewhen and include it into > > > > Openmeetings. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/7/2 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > > > From: Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > > > > > Date: Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:34 PM > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache OpenMeetings 2.1.1 Release Candidate 2 > > > > > To: dev <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear OpenMeetings Community, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to start a vote about releasing Apache OpenMeetings > > 2.1.1 > > > > RC2 > > > > > > > > > > RC1 was rejected because of: > > > > > > > > > > - too few VOTE activity > > > > > > > > > > - incomplete README > > > > > > > > > > Main changes are covered in the Readme: > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/READMEFull > > > > > Changelog: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/CHANGELOGRelease > > > > > artefacts: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc2/Tag: > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/tags/2.1.1RC2/ PGP > > > release > > > > > keys (signed using C467526E): > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openmeetings/2.1.1/rc2/KEYSVote > > > > > will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 > > > > > disapprove (and reason why) My vote is +1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > WBR > > > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > WBR > > > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > WBR > > > Maxim aka solomax > > > > > >
