Then we can remove old build, I guess

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:40 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Using maven 3.2.1 plus java6 (and maybe some commits from various people)
> did fix it. So basically it works with the Maven template of Jenkins as it
> seems.
> Not sure if the normal Jenkins template outputs the same when you simple
> do "mvn" with default target.
>
> Sebastian
> On May 8, 2014 2:02 PM, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Somehow you were able to build it :)
>> great job :)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> It would be nice to have all these features :) BUT :)
>>> I was unable to build our project using 1 command :(
>>> "mvn clean install" in parent project just don't work :(
>>> Too much forking then fail
>>> I tried to ask for the help http://markmail.org/thread/jin5y6vbnsb456ycno 
>>> luck
>>> according to Maven source code "Forking" is started when there is
>>> "ExecuteGoal" or "ExecutePhase", so I believe we need to remove all calls
>>> to ant and get this issue 
>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MWEBSTART-176resolved.
>>>
>>> According to publishing the "publish the assembled Tomcat server
>>> including red5 as a build artifact" I'm afraid we need to create
>>> another one subproject
>>>
>>> But I would like to take a brake with maven tuning :) 3.1.0 need to be
>>> developed :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:56 AM, [email protected] <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> And :)
>>>>
>>>> The build has a dependency (see "upstream projects") into
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-surefire/ which means whenever
>>>> there is a change to the Maven surefire build tools our build is
>>>> automatically triggered as we are depending on it. So kind of we are
>>>> integrated into the Apache Maven infrastructure :)
>>>>
>>>> Sebastian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-05-08 9:51 GMT+12:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>> Each module will automatically publish its own module artifacts, for
>>>>> example:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenMeetingsMaven/3/org.apache.openmeetings$openmeetings-core/
>>>>>
>>>>> We only might need to add something to also publish the assembled
>>>>> Tomcat server including red5 as a build artifact.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-05-08 9:48 GMT+12:00 [email protected] <[email protected]
>>>>> >:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> our current build is using some hand build Jenkins configuration.
>>>>>> Jenkins does actually provide its own Maven template. When you create
>>>>>> a new Job you can see that option.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By using that it results in having this kind of build overview:
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenMeetingsMaven/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With a graph of the test results.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also it shows details of the module builds:
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenMeetingsMaven/3/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and generates automatically the Test Result overview:
>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenMeetingsMaven/3/testReport/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All of that stuff is kind of available in our current build but we
>>>>>> all did that by manually scripting and configuring Jenkins.
>>>>>> I think we should use the Maven template of Jenkins and get rid of
>>>>>> our custom config. We might benefit from improvements that are done to it
>>>>>> in the future with zero effort. And it also looks a bit more cleaner.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>>>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>


-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to