you can do "external" load balancing or use OM cluster http://openmeetings.apache.org/Clustering.html
On 1 September 2014 01:53, Sam Naef <[email protected]> wrote: > ah! > That could be it then :) > Ok so my results seem to be consistent it seems. > > The idea for us is to perhaps have multiple servers and do some kind of > load-balancing to direct users to a free server (so that we can scale > usage). > We're going to test, but hopefully multiple servers of 1core2GB should > hopefully work as it seems that processing power is what OM needs > > thanks > Sam & Doug > > +44 7707575060 > iSKILLu founder > Facebook > Twitter > > > > > > > > > On 31 Aug 2014, at 19:32, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 1 room > > 8cores, 18GB RAM > > > > > > On 1 September 2014 01:26, Sam Naef <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> yes it's version OM 3.0.3 > >> > >> When I test using multiple tabs on my browser, my computer can't hack > more > >> than about 4 tabs (tho i have fast mid 2012 macbook air) > >> > >> - were all your 20 users in the same room? > >> Should 2 cores & 4GB be working for 20 sim. users then? > >> > >> > >> > >> +44 7707575060 > >> iSKILLu founder > >> Facebook > >> Twitter > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 31 Aug 2014, at 15:26, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> What version of OM have you tested? > >>> we were able to have room with ~20video users (simulated by multiple > >>> browsers tabs) > >>> I believe 3.0.3 latest version should work better than 3.0.2 > >>> > >>> > >>> On 31 August 2014 20:35, Sam Naef <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Maxim et all, > >>>> > >>>> We have just carried out our first largeish user test of OM :) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Here are our results: > >>>> We are using 2 cores, 4GB ram vps > >>>> > >>>> Users in the same room, we were able to get: > >>>> 7vids, 9 people+audio > >>>> 50-70% processers usage > >>>> mostly OK > >>>> > >>>> 9 vids, 15 people +audio > >>>> 90% of processors usage > >>>> massive glitching > >>>> > >>>> Users in different rooms: > >>>> When we compared 6 people in the same room to 3 rooms of 2 each, the > >>>> processing usage dropped by 50% (i think this is expected as less > >> bandwidth > >>>> is being sent?) > >>>> > >>>> I'm also guessing that you don't have a program that replicates a > >>>> stress-test by any chance…? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Kindest regards! > >>>> Sam & Doug > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> WBR > >>> Maxim aka solomax > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
