you should start working using 3.1.x branch (will require maven)
you error if caused by maven repo inaccessibility (not sure how to help
here :(( )

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Wentao Liu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Maxim,
>
>
>
> Glad to know the steps to be a committer:)).
>
>
>
> Here is a problem need your verification.
>
>
>
> I downloaded source: svn checkout
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/branches/3.0.x/
>
> JDK is 1.7 and Ant is 1.9.4(minimum 1.8.3).
>
>
>
> But I got an error message which I thought AntClassLoader is different
> from Eclipse ClassLoader.  Do I need install eclipse to build the system or
> can I modify ivysettings.xml file to add a url to include the
> AntClassLoader?
>
>
>
> Attached is the output file, please help to check.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> 刘文涛 Wentao Liu
>
> Partner of a cloud company
> Hunan Yun Zhong Man Bu Information Technology corp.Ltd
> 湖南云中漫步信息技术有限公司
> Mobile phone: +86-13687359517
> Fax: +86-731-88716009
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Maxim Solodovnik
> *Sent: *2015年11月26日 15:39
> *To: *cscmucmm
> *Cc: *dev
> *Subject: *Re: Help in Openlaszlo code
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello Wentao,
>
>
>
> sorry for the late response currently busy with my day time job
>
> To be a commiter you can check
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS and try to fix any
>
> unresolved issue
>
> then you can attach patches to the issues
>
>
>
> we will review the patches and provide you with some comments if any
>
>
>
> I might ask INFRA for RW github mirroring to simplify this process
>
>
>
> happy patching :))
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:22 AM, cscmucmm <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sorry for the typo,Maxim. I need check out 3.1.x and probably need learn
>
> > how to commit.
>
> >
>
> > Do you think I can do commit at this point?Wanna to be a committer.
>
> >
>
> > Thanks for the help.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Sent from China Unicom 4G TD-LTE
>
> > iPhone5s
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ------------------ Original ------------------
>
> > *From:* Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>
> > *Date:* 周五,11月 20,2015 12:28
>
> > *To:* Wentao Liu <[email protected]>
>
> > *Subject:* Re: Help in Openlaszlo code
>
> >
>
> > Hello Wentao,
>
> >
>
> > where is no such thing as 1.3.x sources
>
> > trunk right now has version 4.0.0 (not 3.0.7)
>
> > so I'm totally lost with your post
>
> >
>
> > to get version 3.1.0 you need branch 3.1.x, but it still contains
>
> > openlaszlo code
>
> >
>
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Wentao Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> Hi Maxim,
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Is it a way to get the source of branch 1.3.x?
>
> >>
>
> >> When I checked out
>
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/trunk/singlewebapp, I can
>
> >> only get 3.0.7 which I think it is still the openlaszo version.
>
> >>
>
> >> Probably you need add me in SVN server?
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Thanks,
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>
> >>
>
> >> 刘文涛 Wentao Liu
>
> >>
>
> >> Partner of a cloud company
>
> >> Hunan Yun Zhong Man Bu Information Technology corp.Ltd
>
> >> 湖南云中漫步信息技术有限公司
>
> >> Mobile phone: +86-13687359517
>
> >> Fax: +86-731-88716009
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> *From: *Maxim Solodovnik
>
> >> *Sent: *2015年11月20日 1:59
>
> >> *To: *[email protected]
>
> >> *Cc: *dev
>
> >> *Subject: *Re: Help in Openlaszlo code
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> It is something inside the chat which broke everything :(
>
> >>
>
> >> Thanks a lot for your help, now I can move forward
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]
> >
>
> >>
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> > same
>
> >>
>
> >> > new lz.errorPopup(canvas,{error:'Invalid Hash'});
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > added to the main.lzx works as expected, will try to remove code block
>
> >> by
>
> >>
>
> >> > block and find the cause
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> [email protected]
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> >> Maybe you know
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> can I have sources for "view" class so I can check how this event is
>
> >>
>
> >> >> produced?
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>
> >> [email protected]>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>> just tried to add
>
> >>
>
> >> >>> new lz.errorPopup(canvas,{error:'Invalid Hash'});
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>> errorPopup was modified to print debug info in "oninit" handler, no
>
> >>
>
> >> >>> printing :(
>
> >>
>
> >> >>> I'm absolutely lost :(
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>
> >> [email protected]>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>> "construct" was added by me to ensure at least something is working
>
> >> :(
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>> will try other ideas
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>> somehow the only "oninit" being printed is the one in main.lxz
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>> will try to fix/workaround this somehow :(
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>> Thanks for the ideas!
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:19 PM, [email protected] <
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> Okay I see your updates.
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> Have you tried removing the "onconstruct", will the oninit then
> call
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> correctly ?
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> Another idea would be to change:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> <class name="restrictedConferenceRoom"
> extends="baseConferenceRoom">
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> to instead extend something more simple.
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> And maybe remove the "fixedFileExplorerWhiteboardPanel" out of the
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> class just to get an idea where the relevant code that leads to
> the
>
> >> issue
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> is situated.
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> Sebastian
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> 2015-11-19 21:01 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]
> >:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>> sorry my 'svn commit' failed and I haven't noticed that :(
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>> now the line numbers should be correct
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>> whole code is being compiled with 'swf11' option, so I expect the
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>> whole output is swf11
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>> could you please examine sources one more time
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 1:51 PM, [email protected] <
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> Hm,
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> at line ~516, there is no room inited in:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openmeetings/branches/3.1.x/openmeetings-flash/src/main/swf/base/mainMethods.lzx?view=markup
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> it says new lz.testSetup and passes the classname of the room.
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> Then in:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openmeetings/branches/3.1.x/openmeetings-flash/src/main/swf/modules/conference/testsetup/testSetup.lzx?view=markup
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> new lz[this.roomClassName](canvas.main_content._content.inner, {
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>                                        roomobj:this.roomObj
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>                                        });
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> creates the room and then directly calls
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> this.destroy();
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> And you say in
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openmeetings/branches/3.1.x/openmeetings-flash/src/main/swf/modules/conference/flexibleConferenceRoom/restrictedConferenceRoom.lzx?view=markup
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> You can't find any output produced by:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> <handler name="oninit">
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>        if ($debug) Debug.write("restrictedConferenceRoom::oninit
>
> >> ");
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> </handler>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> In the debug window of the OpenLaszlo swf9 application (there is
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> still the swf8 debugger window somewhere) ?
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> I have seen some strange stuff before but it was usually
> possible
>
> >> to
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> explain, or at least possible to deconstruct the issue.
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> One possibility is obviously the immediately "this.destroy()" in
>
> >> the
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> testSetup.lzx, I would maybe try to remove that to see if that
>
> >> has some
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> sort of effect.
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> But yeah this debug should be always produced somehow. In case
> you
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> can really rule out all debugger side effects or uncertainties
>
> >> you might
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> want to strip down the code further until you just simply do a
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> initialisation of a simple lz.view.
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> Thanks,
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> Sebastian
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> 2015-11-19 17:00 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <
> [email protected]
>
> >> >:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>> same time 'onvisible' handler is called as expected :(
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello Sebastian, thanks for the quick response
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> here is the example:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> in [1] line 516 I'm creating restricted room [2] (by direct
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> calling 'new' for simplicity)
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> restricted room and all its ancestors have Debug.write in
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> constructor (I have added dummy constructor to check what is
>
> >> going on) and
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> in oninit handler
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> According to debug output, constructor is being called while
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> oninit is not :(
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> [1]
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/branches/3.1.x/openmeetings-flash/src/main/swf/base/mainMethods.lzx
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> [2]
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openmeetings/branches/3.1.x/openmeetings-flash/src/main/swf/modules/conference/flexibleConferenceRoom/restrictedConferenceRoom.lzx
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:25 AM, [email protected] <
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> can you point at the class/file/line-number of the file in
> the
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> SVN that has this issue ?
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Sebastian
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2015-11-18 18:43 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <
>
> >> [email protected]
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> >:
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sebastian,
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you ever saw situation like this and can help to
>
> >> resolve it
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm currently moving on Openlaszlo code to be swf11 (in
> branch
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3.1.x)
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> It is hard process, and the main difficulty is: on some
> reason
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> "oninit" handler is not being called on components :( Maybe
>
> >> you ever saw
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> behavior like this and can suggest how to resolve it?
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance for any help!
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> --
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> --
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> WBR
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>> --
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>> WBR
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> --
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>> [email protected]
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>> --
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>> WBR
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> --
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>> [email protected]
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>> --
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>> WBR
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>> Maxim aka solomax
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>> --
>
> >>
>
> >> >>> WBR
>
> >>
>
> >> >>> Maxim aka solomax
>
> >>
>
> >> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >> --
>
> >>
>
> >> >> WBR
>
> >>
>
> >> >> Maxim aka solomax
>
> >>
>
> >> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >> > --
>
> >>
>
> >> > WBR
>
> >>
>
> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>
> >>
>
> >> >
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >> --
>
> >>
>
> >> WBR
>
> >>
>
> >> Maxim aka solomax
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > WBR
>
> > Maxim aka solomax
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> WBR
>
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to