I see no objections so I'll perform the change :) On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello all, > > recently one of the Apache members point me to inconsistencies in our SVN > tree structure. > Usually component have 'plain' structure > > Module > -- trunk > -- branches > -- tags > > we have structure like this: > > OM > --trunk > -- debian/ > -- debian_package/ > -- patches/ > -- plugins/ > -- singlewebapp/ > -- site/ > -- branches (of singlewebapp) > -- tags (of singlewebapp) > > I propose following structure: > OM > -- application > -- trunk > -- branches > -- tags > -- debian > -- trunk (with contents of *debian_package*, *debian* should be > removed as it is GPL licensed) > -- plugin > -- trunk (plugins from trunk and branches should be moved here) > -- site > -- trunk (with contents of trunk/site) > -- branches (with 3.0.x and 2.x docs) > > Additionally I would like to ask INFRA to create RW mirror of OM (or at > least OM/application) at git > > please let me know in case you are against such restructuring or would > like to propose different structure > > Thanks in advance > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
