high level description is OK with me we can add Paul to the discussion, WDYT?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Dmitry Bezheckov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > I think about it now. > We can't remove central server in general, but we can distribute video and > audio channel as Maxim said. > I like to think that we have: > > 1. SCTP (GSOC 2015) for signaling > 2. TURN[/STUN] server for NAT traversing (GSOC 2016) > 3. SRTP protocol for secure sharing media (GSOC 2016) > > > As I can see SRTP protocol has implemented in Java already (for example in > jitsu - > https://github.com/jitsi/libjitsi/tree/master/src/org/jitsi/impl/neomedia/transform/srtp > ) > > If this high-level description is OK, I can create issue in jira and write > more detailed proposal. > > P.s. for second point exist ice4j library (GSOC 2014 - 2015), but I hasn't > seen on this clearly yet. > > On 15.03.2016 03:15, [email protected] wrote: > >> Hi Dmitry, >> >> your ideas are all very interesting, however to tailor a GSoC2016 project >> out of it you have to choose something which will fit into the program of >> a >> few months of work. >> And it will need a defined scope/requirement and success criteria. >> >> What is your exact proposal ? >> >> Thanks, >> Sebastian >> >> >> >> 2016-03-10 19:40 GMT+13:00 Dmitry Bezheckov <[email protected]>: >> >> >>> >>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas >>> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:41:51 +0600 >>> From: Dmitriy - <[email protected]> >>> To: dev <[email protected]> >>> CC: Openmeetings user-list <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> I think it's a good idea to continue gsoc2015 direction for OM. >>> First of all we can change OM architecture from central server to p2p and >>> then use new protocols like QUIC or SCTP. >>> Using this we also save our ability save video on central server. Central >>> server will not only link clients, but also include itself in connection. >>> And we also can support flash clinets too. >>> The protocols were developed for http 2 purposes and so using this >>> protocols will improve perfomance OM on andoid and desktop, as I can see >>> android is one of main architecture for OM. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no >>> areas of >>> improvement in OpenMeetings? >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hello All, >>> > >>> > GSOC 2016 is coming :) >>> > In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC >>> ideas for >>> > our project >>> > >>> > I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any >>> additional >>> > ideas in this thread >>> > Looking forward for you comments :) >>> > >>> > [1] >>> > >>> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016 >>> > >>> > -- >>> > WBR >>> > Maxim aka solomax >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> WBR >>> Maxim aka solomax >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Dmitry Bezheckov. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
