Hi Maxim, I don't think so. The caldav4j team tried to do the migration for over 1 year now: https://github.com/caldav4j/caldav4j/issues/13
And they still have not succeeded. We can give it a try but I doubt it's that simple. From what I understood in that thread is that JackRabbit APIs are not compatible as it was not build for being re-used or a plugin replacement for Apache Slide. So there will be substantial work to do here. Thx Sebastian 2016-05-08 21:47 GMT+12:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>: > sure, NP, I can place it into our repo as soon as you feel it's ready :) > > when it will be ready > please send me the URL to the repo and some basic build instructions > > On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Ankush Mishra <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks for the response. I'll try to complete by next week. And since the > > library isn't in Maven Central, we'll have to place it in the > OpenMeetings > > repo, as well. > > > > Ankush Mishra > > On 8 May 2016 15:04, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hello Sebastian, > >> > >> usually library replacement is as simple as update pom.xml and perform > >> full text replace of classes/packages > >> seems to be easy > >> > >> I believe this can be done as part of GSOC project without any major > >> effect to the roadmap > >> > >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:05 AM, [email protected] < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Maxim, > >>> > >>> during the meeting we discussed a few points: > >>> > >>> 1) I added Ankush and Dima to Jira and assigned the tickets > >>> > >>> 2) We had a quick chat around Caldav and libraries. > >>> https://github.com/caldav4j > >>> Seems to support it but has a few issues in compiling. That is > something > >>> we can fix. > >>> But it is using a deprecated library (http://jakarta.apache.org/slide/ > >>> ). > >>> We would need to lift this to use the library to use > >>> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/ instead. However this has not been done > >>> yet. > >>> > >>> So the issue is that we need to decide on if we want to do this as part > >>> of GSoC. > >>> This could be a quite significant piece of work. If we added to the > >>> scope of this project it could mean less time in doing any actual > >>> OpenMeetings enhancements. > >>> > >>> What do you think? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Sebastian > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Sebastian Wagner > >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >>> [email protected] > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> WBR > >> Maxim aka solomax > >> > > > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax > -- Sebastian Wagner https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock [email protected]
