"Lieutenant Columbo"? :)) WebRTC performs network interface selection during negotiation phase (I believe so) I believe this need to be additionally tested
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 14:10, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > yes OM4. > > Then I will recommend my users in the provides handout to turn of other > NICs ... ;-) > > Thank a lot for clarifying. > > Do you know Columbo? > > I have one more question... How will this be handled in OM5? > > Greetings Peter > > Am 06.09.19 um 08:55 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > > Hello Peter, > > > > what I can _suspect_ client device get NETWORK_CHANGED message from OS > > And performed re-connection to OM > > Since it is (most probably) OM4, maybe it was something initiated by > Adobe > > Flash (for ex. connections were created to get the best one ....) > > > > On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 13:51, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> yes, but I'm nearly sure he/she was sitting at his/her desk... > >> > >> I just don't know, what the other connections are for... If the used > >> connection is the "best available" and the others are just for > >> safety/backup/measuring or whatever it is fine, but if I go to my desk, > >> put in a Cable (because someone told me cable connections are more > >> stable) and streaming will be done over an 3G connection this is not > >> what I would expect... > >> > >> I just would like to know, what are the additional connections are for. > >> > >> Greetings Peter > >> > >> Am 05.09.19 um 19:50 schrieb Raphael Bircher: > >>> Hi all > >>> > >>> This happened also, when you travel with a Mobile device. For example > >>> working in a train. You have not really the chance to control this. > >>> > >>> Regards Raphael > >>> > >>> Am 05.09.2019 um 14:09 schrieb Peter Dähn: > >>>> IPv6 should be handled somehow by the network interface. > >>>> > >>>> I could guess... > >>>> > >>>> It is a M$ notebook with 2 sims (4G and LTE), wirless LAN and LAN... I > >>>> think jumping around these access networks isn't a good idea while > using > >>>> "realtime streaming"... thats why I'm ask about stability... > >>>> > >>>> Greetings Peter > >>>> > >>>> Am 05.09.19 um 13:00 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > >>>>> >From what I can see one address is IPv6 > >>>>> Another one seems to be some other IPv4 address (not sure maybe > client > >>>>> device has more than one network interface) > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 17:52, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Maxim, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> performance on different networks might be different. Mobile > networks > >>>>>> could cause connection losses easily... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> As far as I see, 84.148.x.x is used mainly. What the others are for? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Greetings Peter > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Am 05.09.19 um 12:42 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > >>>>>>> Hello Peter, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I see no problems here > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 at 17:40, Peter Dähn <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I had a look in the conference_log table today. I found > >>>>>>>> something, that > >>>>>>>> confuses me a bit... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> One user uses 4 IPs during one session. At least one of them was > >>>>>>>> from a > >>>>>>>> mobile network. By now multihomed devices are not regular used > with > >>>>>>>> openmeetings because of flash and mobile devices. But this could > >>>>>>>> change > >>>>>>>> with om 5.0.0. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Could this circumstance cause problems with e.g. performance, > >>>>>>>> stability > >>>>>> or > >>>>>>>> ... ? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Greetings Peter > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> B.Sc. Peter Dähn > >>>>>>>> Virtueller Campus Rheinland-Pfalz <http://www.vcrp.de/> > >>>>>>>> Postfach 3049 > >>>>>>>> 67653 Kaiserslautern > >>>>>>>> Tel: 0631/205-4944 > >>>>>>>> Olat <https://olat.vcrp.de/> > >>>>>>>> > >> > >> > > > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
