I did generate those the same like before. They are generated via the Maven
command. Not manually

It seems the checksums match
% shasum -a 512 6.2.0/bin/apache-openmeetings-6.2.0.tar.gz
37a42ce7b4ee954013c09820e6501f8996d357327cebeff1e8b125ba3dc74f86f961d2175c81ec7951ce30b255ec833f3118465b838aa543dac3b7a9f85452ca
 6.2.0/bin/apache-openmeetings-6.2.0.tar.gz
% cat 6.2.0/bin/apache-openmeetings-6.2.0.tar.gz.sha512
37a42ce7b4ee954013c09820e6501f8996d357327cebeff1e8b125ba3dc74f86f961d2175c81ec7951ce30b255ec833f3118465b838aa543dac3b7a9f85452ca%

same like:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openmeetings/6.2.0/bin/apache-openmeetings-6.2.0.tar.gz.sha512

I don't see any discrepancy. Not sure what the formatting error in sha513
means.

Thanks
Seb

Sebastian Wagner
Director Arrakeen Solutions, OM-Hosting.com
http://arrakeen-solutions.co.nz/
https://om-hosting.com - Cloud & Server Hosting for HTML5
Video-Conferencing OpenMeetings
<https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/da4e8828-743d-4968-af6f-49033f10d60a/public_url>
<https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/b7e709c6-aa87-4b02-9faf-099038475e36/public_url>


On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 15:59, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> wrote:

> What I mean by "sha512 hashes are no more automatically testable" is:
>
> sha512sum --check
> release/openmeetings/6.2.0/bin/apache-openmeetings-6.2.0.tar.gz.sha512
> sha512sum:
> release/openmeetings/6.2.0/bin/apache-openmeetings-6.2.0.tar.gz.sha512: no
> properly formatted SHA512 checksum lines found
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:43, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> (subject is fixed, mobile autocorrection)
>>
>> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:37, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Seb,
>>>
>>> Yesterday i've noticed
>>> Both 'dev' and 'release' area has 6.2.0
>>>
>>> And sha512 hashes are no more automatically testable (I've fixed this
>>> for rc3)
>>>
>>> What were your steps?
>>>
>>>
>>> from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Maxim
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>

Reply via email to