Just a minor point here... there were some changes made to the way the isObsGrouping and hasGroupMembers works in 1.9.0 but I'm questioning now if we've made the right decision.
To do a quick summary: In 1.9.0, the default parameter-less obs.hasGroupMembers() and obs.isObsGrouping() methods return true if the obs in question havs 1 or more *non-voided* member obs. This seems like the right behavior for hasGroupMembers (and there also now a hasGroupMembers(Boolean includeVoided) if you want to override this behavior) but I would think perhaps that obs.isObsGrouping() should return true if the obs in question has 1 or more members obs *of any type*, voided *or* non-voided. The logic is like this... if you have an obs that has two child obs that are both voided, even though I would say it "has no group members" I would still consider it "an obs grouping". Thoughts? Mark _________________________________________ To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body (not the subject) of your e-mail. [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]
