Assuming the jar within the omod target only contains web classes as you
say, then how about:

   - Rename Target/omod/moduleid-x.y.z.jar to
   Target/omod/moduleid-omod-x.y.z.jar (only contains web classes)
   - Create a Target/omod/moduleid-x.y.z.jar that contains both API + web
   classes (.omod would just be a copy with .omod extension)
   - mvn deploy would deploy the moduleid-x.y.z.jar containing API + web
   classes
   - (eventually) uploading an omod to the module repository would deploy
   to mvn as well if it hadn't already been done

So, devs could either deploy an artifact via mvn deploy *or* just upload
their omod to the module repository.

-Burke

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Mark Goodrich <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes… but I’m not exactly sure understand it/agree with it…****
>
> ** **
>
> I would assume that we would want to use mvn deploy to deploy the
> module-api and module-omod jars to maven repo.  But, if I’m reading it
> right… we won’t use mvn deploy to deploy modules to the maven repo.
> Instead we would simply run a mvn package and then create a ticket to add
> the module jar to maven repo.  It is also unclear exactly what file we
> would use as the jar.  Running a mvn package creates the following files:*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Target/api/addresshierarchy-api-2.2.0.jar  (which only includes the api
> classes)****
>
> Target/omod/addresshierarchy-2.2.0.jar (which appears to only include the
> omod classes)****
>
> Target/omod/addresshierarchy-2.2.0.omod (which assumedly includes both the
> omod and api classes)****
>
> ** **
>
> If we want to reference a module just using
> <artifactId>module-name</artifactId> instead of
> <artifactId>module-name-api</artifactId> we would have to rename either
> addresshierarchy-api-2.2.0.jar or addresshierarchy-2.2.0.omod to
> addresshierarchy-2.2.0.jar.****
>
> ** **
>
> Mark****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ben Wolfe
> *Sent:* Monday, January 09, 2012 1:55 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [OPENMRS-DEV] Including one mavenized module within
> another mavenized module****
>
> ** **
>
> Have you seen this page?
>
> https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/docs/Requiring+another+module+in+your+module
>
> Ben****
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Mark Goodrich <[email protected]> wrote:**
> **
>
> Hello all—****
>
>  ****
>
> I’m having a little trouble referencing one mavenized module within
> another mavenized module and am looking for some feedback on what the
> preferred way to do this is via maven.****
>
>  ****
>
> I was able to deploy the address hierarchy module to the Openmrs maven
> repo via mvn deploy, and confirmed that the addresshierarchy poms and jars
> have been successfully added to the repo.  Now I have a second module that
> uses a service provided by the Address Hierarchy module. I’ve tried linking
> address hierarchy as a pom dependency in the main pom and the api pom of
> the second module using both the following methods, but in all cases  I get
> compile errors when building the second module because the relevant Address
> Hierarchy classes can’t be found:****
>
>  ****
>
> <dependency>****
>
>   <groupId>org.openmrs.module</groupId>****
>
>                 <artifactId>*addresshierarchy*</artifactId>****
>
>                 <version>2.2.0</version>****
>
>                 <type>pom</type>****
>
>                <scope>provided</scope>****
>
> </dependency>****
>
>  ****
>
> <dependency>****
>
>   <groupId>org.openmrs.module</groupId>****
>
>                 <artifactId>*addresshierarchy-api*</artifactId>****
>
>                 <version>2.2.0</version>****
>
>                 <type>pom</type>****
>
>                 <scope>provided</scope>****
>
> </dependency>****
>
>  ****
>
> The only way I can get it to build correctly is to reference the
> addresshierarchy-api jar directly:****
>
>  ****
>
> <dependency>****
>
>   <groupId>org.openmrs.module</groupId>****
>
>                 <artifactId>*addresshierarchy-api*</artifactId>****
>
>                 <version>2.2.0</version>****
>
>                 <type>jar<type>****
>
>                 <scope>provided</scope>****
>
> </dependency>****
>
>  ****
>
> Is this what we want?  Or is there some way to include via pom that I am
> missing?****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Mark****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
> ------------------------------
>
> Click here to 
> unsubscribe<[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from 
> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
> ****
>
> ** **
> ------------------------------
>
> Click here to 
> unsubscribe<[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from 
> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
> ****
> ------------------------------
> Click here to 
> unsubscribe<[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from 
> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>

_________________________________________

To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to 
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not 
the subject) of your e-mail.

[mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

Reply via email to