The messaging module has a task that runs every 5 seconds and generates a log 
message in the log file every time whenever it runs. Is there a way to suppress 
this type of logging messages in my log file? I have checked all my of 
modules's log4j.xml settings to ensure all of the log level to be WARN or above 
but that does not seem to help to suppress the logs from the LoggingAdvice.

INFO - LoggingAdvice.invoke(102) |2012-02-22 13:16:25,606| In method 
SchedulerService.saveTask. Arguments: TaskDefinition=[TaskDefinition  id=12 
name=Messaging Module Gateway Manager 
class=org.openmrs.module.messaging.schedulertask.DispatchMessagesTask 
startTime=null repeatInterval=5 secondsUntilNext=0],
INFO - LoggingAdvice.invoke(127) |2012-02-22 13:16:25,607| Exiting method 
saveTask

Any suggestions would be highly appreciated!

Thanks,
Hui Xiao

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Wolfe
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 10:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OPENMRS-DEV] concept_reference_term and sync

Perhaps this is why we originally had hardcoded the uuids to be some 
combination of the map name and source hl7 code?  We undid that recently 
because it wasn't actually turning out to be unique.

Dave, this is something that should be added to the Sync Upgrade Scripts jsp 
page.  "The scripts here should be generated on the PARENT server AFTER 
upgrading and run on your CHILD databases BEFORE you upgrade them to the new 
version".

Ben
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Dave Thomas 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi.  Thanks for the explanations.  sync works through the hibernate 
interceptor, so when you're running direct SQL updates, these aren't going to 
get logged.  At least I don't think they will, because liquibase isn't using 
the openmrs services, right?  And actually, if they do get logged, I would 
expect liquibase to fail spectacularly on the child servers, because many of 
its changes would have already been applied by sync.

For sync, I think the rules around liquibase are that if you're adding a row to 
a table that has uuids, those uuids should be hard coded into the liquibase xml.

I'm ok with hacking those tables manually after the upgrade, I just need to 
figure out the exact routine ahead of time.

D
On Feb 21, 2012 4:49 PM, "Wyclif Luyima" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Dave,

I'm not sure how sync handles changes that are a result of running liquibase 
upgrade scripts. However, from my understanding there should be no conflict of 
any sort in uuids for reference terms since concept_reference_term and 
concept_map_type are new tables that were added in 1.9. What those liquibase 
changesets are doing is they generate concept reference terms from your 
existing concept_map  table, they also insert new rows in the newly created 
table concept_map_type.

An overview of the changes (You can visit additions in concept mapping 
attributes<https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/projects/Additional+Attributes+on+Concept+Map+%28Design+Page%29>
 for a some background info)

Before 1.9 a concept map had minimal data about it and one of its properties 
was the sourcecode property which in the real world of concept dictionaries is 
not supposed to be looked at as a mere string but rather a more compound 
property that has attributes like name, version, description and a list of 
other terms that are related to it. Further more,  when you create a mapping, 
you need to specify the map type which  describes the relationship between it 
and the one you are mapping to in the other dictionary. Examples of my types 
are; replaced by, is broader, is narrower, interprets etc. This is the kind of 
design for concept mappings that folks that manage concept dictionaries desired 
OpenMRS to have and this is why the changes were made.

I assumed sync has a mechanism to properly handle additions made by such 
upgrades scripts so that they get copied to the other servers.

Wyclif


On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Dave Thomas 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
And it looks like the same issue is going to exist with concept_map_type?

d

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dave Thomas 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi.  I could use some help wrapping my mind around what I think is an 
incompatibility between sync and the liquibase upgrade scripts.

ConceptReferenceTerm is an OpenmrsObject, meaning that sync is going to pay 
attention to it.

However, in the liquibase scripts, the concept_reference_term table is 
populated with the following SQL:

INSERT INTO concept_reference_term (concept_reference_term_id, 
concept_source_id, code, description, creator, date_created, uuid)
            SELECT cm.concept_map_id, cm.source, cm.source_code, cm.comment, 
cm.creator, cm.date_created, UUID()
            FROM concept_reference_map cm, concept_reference_source crs
            WHERE cm.source = crs.concept_source_id

This means that the 'same' ConceptReferenceTerms are going to have different 
UUIDs between the parent and child sync servers.   So if on the parent i modify 
a ConceptReferenceTerm, that's going to cause a sync failure -- its not going 
to be able to find the object.

I don't know exactly what ConceptReferenceTerms do -- does it look like upon 
upgrading all child servers, we're going to have to override the liquibase 
results for this table?

d

________________________________
Click here to 
unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l> 
from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list

________________________________
Click here to 
unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l> 
from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
________________________________
Click here to 
unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l> 
from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list

________________________________
Click here to 
unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l> 
from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list

_________________________________________

To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to 
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not 
the subject) of your e-mail.

[mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

Reply via email to