OK thanks. I suppose the question is also related to the earlier discussion today about harmonising uuids, at least between systems in a particular universe, so that whatever grammar which emerges for defining a report would make sense between those different systems.
On 2 April 2012 16:46, Michael Seaton <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > It is not a silly question. It is planned, but currently not possible. > I've been putting it off a bit since we are considering re-writing the > means by which reporting definitions are stored in the database, and because > many of our users interact with the reporting module via the API through > module. I agree that this is a pretty important feature to have for anyone > defining their cohort queries, indicators, and reports, exclusively via the > UI. > > Mike > > > > > On 04/02/2012 11:07 AM, Bob Jolliffe wrote: >> >> Apologies if this is a silly question. Setting up reports with cohort >> indicators, cohort queries etc can be quite an involved process. Is >> there a straightforward way to share these reports between systems? >> Is it just a particular subset of metadata import/export >> functionality? >> >> Regards >> Bob >> >> _________________________________________ >> >> To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to >> [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body (not >> the subject) of your e-mail. >> >> [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l] > > > _________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to > [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body (not > the subject) of your e-mail. > > [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l] _________________________________________ To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body (not the subject) of your e-mail. [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]
