Yes, that's it, at a quick glance I figured that the method that got a
stream was for writing, not reading.

-Darius

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Ben Wolfe <b...@openmrs.org> wrote:

> Ah, ok, I see what you mean now and I totally agree!  We do only have one
> method to write to the feed, and that will be synchronized:
> AtomFeedUtil.writeToFeed(action, OpenmrsObject)
>
> This method you are looking at is: AtomFeedUtil.getAtomFeedStream(). It
> gets an OutputStream for the servlet to display the feed.  It has to be
> public.  Perhaps we should rename it to be more obvious that you are
> getting the stream for output purposes and not input purposes?
>
> Ben
>
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Darius Jazayeri <djazay...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I meant that the method should not be publicly accessible. The service
>> should only expose a single method that adds a feed item to the file.
>>
>> -Darius (by phone)
>> On May 7, 2012 7:20 PM, "Ben Wolfe" <b...@openmrs.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Threading is dealt with by activemq.
>>>
>>> This method does need to be synchronized. But why does it need to be in
>>> a service layer? No db transaction is occurring.
>>>
>>> Ben
>>> On May 7, 2012 7:09 PM, "Darius Jazayeri" <dar...@openmrs.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ben,
>>>>
>>>> I just peeked at this review when I saw it in my inbox. Maybe you're
>>>> dealing with threading and synchronization elsewhere, I haven't looked.
>>>>
>>>> I'm a bit worried that we're giving static access to getting a stream
>>>> to the file that stores the atom feed in a Util method.
>>>>
>>>> Don't we want this to be in the service layer, and don't we want to
>>>> ensure that writing a new entry to that file is a synchronized, atomic
>>>> operation?
>>>>
>>>> -Darius
>>>>
>>>>  On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Mykola Vorobey <
>>>> fisheye-nore...@openmrs.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>    [image: Crucible] <https://source.openmrs.org/cru>    [image:
>>>>> Review]  ATOM-7 <https://tickets.openmrs.org/browse/ATOM-7> -
>>>>> Implement AtomFeedUtil.getAtomFeedStream   
>>>>> CR-MOD-416<https://source.openmrs.org/cru/CR-MOD-416>
>>>>>  The state of CR-MOD-416 <https://source.openmrs.org/cru/CR-MOD-416>has 
>>>>> been changed:
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Mykola Vorobey changed it to Review
>>>>>
>>>>>   Participants     <https://source.openmrs.org/user/mvorobey>  Mykola
>>>>> Vorobey <https://source.openmrs.org/user/mvorobey>  Author   
>>>>> <https://source.openmrs.org/user/darius>  Darius
>>>>> Jazayeri <https://source.openmrs.org/user/darius>  Reviewer   
>>>>> <https://source.openmrs.org/user/bwolfe>  Ben
>>>>> Wolfe <https://source.openmrs.org/user/bwolfe>  Reviewer
>>>>>   Sent by Atlassian Crucible <http://www.atlassian.com/crucible>2.7.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Click here to 
>>>> unsubscribe<lists...@listserv.iupui.edu?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from
>>>>  OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> Click here to 
>>> unsubscribe<lists...@listserv.iupui.edu?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from 
>>> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Click here to 
>> unsubscribe<lists...@listserv.iupui.edu?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from 
>> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>>
>
> ------------------------------
> Click here to 
> unsubscribe<lists...@listserv.iupui.edu?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from 
> OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>

_________________________________________

To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to 
lists...@listserv.iupui.edu with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not 
the subject) of your e-mail.

[mailto:lists...@listserv.iupui.edu?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

Reply via email to