Thank you for the feedback.

I don't know if the report I have in mind for the POS Tagger would apply
for the DocCat. I attached an example output to the Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-449



On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 also needed for doccat.
>
> Maybe it can be created by a class which could also
> be used for doccat.
>
> Jörn
>
>
> On 02/26/2012 03:13 AM, Jason Baldridge wrote:
>
>> +1 Fine-grained error analysis FTW!
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 4:57 PM, [email protected]<
>> [email protected]>  wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> I implemented a new EvaluationMonitor for the POS Tagger. It generates
>>> a confusion
>>> matrix<http://en.wikipedia.**org/wiki/Confusion_matrix<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confusion_matrix>>
>>>  for each token that
>>> was not tagged properly.
>>>
>>> Example output (Portuguese):
>>>
>>> ...
>>> Accuracy for [que]: 91,34%
>>> 1316 ocurrencies. Confusion matrix (line: reference; column: predicted):
>>>           |    conj-s | pron-indp |       adv |  pron-det || % Accu ||
>>>    conj-s |>      537<|       40  |        0  |        0  || 93,07% ||
>>>  pron-indp |       59  |>      661<|        0  |        0  || 91,81% ||
>>>       adv |        2  |       12  |>        4<|        0  || 22,22% ||
>>>  pron-det |        0  |        1  |        0  |>        0<||     0% ||
>>>
>>> Accuracy for [o]: 98,48%
>>> 3949 ocurrencies. Confusion matrix (line: reference; column: predicted):
>>>           |       art |  pron-det | pron-pers |         , || % Accu ||
>>>       art |>     3857<|        4  |        0  |        1  || 99,87% ||
>>>  pron-det |       36  |>       24<|        0  |        0  ||    40% ||
>>>  pron-pers |       19  |        0  |>        8<|        0  || 29,63% ||
>>>         , |        0  |        0  |        0  |>        0<||     0% ||
>>>
>>> Accuracy for [a]: 96%
>>> 4395 ocurrencies. Confusion matrix (line: reference; column: predicted):
>>>           |       art |       prp | pron-pers |  pron-det || % Accu ||
>>>       art |>     3291<|       54  |        0  |        0  || 98,39% ||
>>>       prp |      107  |>      922<|        0  |        0  ||  89,6% ||
>>>  pron-pers |        4  |        0  |>        4<|        0  ||    50% ||
>>>  pron-det |       11  |        0  |        0  |>        2<|| 15,38% ||
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Do you think it is interesting to make this report available?
>>> I would add it to the CLI and it would be activated by an new argument
>>> that
>>> pass in an output file for the report.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> William
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to