Very reasonable. Along with deprecation and other major changes. Aliaksandr
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Jörn Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com> wrote: > We should not update the JVM for 1.5.3 because people > would not expect that. > > +1 to update with out next bigger release. > > Jörn > > > On 07/19/2012 10:13 PM, Aliaksandr Autayeu wrote: > >> Well, I don't know about such a feature - it is usually a host of small >> nuisances, like today error. >> >> Aliaksandr >> >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Jörn Kottmann <kottm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> On 07/19/2012 09:01 PM, Aliaksandr Autayeu wrote: >>> >>> Fixed. But may be we need to consider moving on to Java6? OpenNLP is the >>>> only project I have on Java5. Actually, just downloaded JDK5 for it. >>>> We're >>>> two versions behind now. Anything in particular which holds us back? Any >>>> users hardly constrained to Java5? >>>> >>>> >>>> OpenNLP works nicely with Java6, I never run it on Java5 actually, in >>> older >>> JVMs there is a bug with the sentence detector which crashes it. >>> Never tried Java 7 but I assume that works as well. >>> >>> Is there a special feature you would like to use which is Java 6 or 7 >>> only, >>> so that we have to move? >>> >>> Yes, you are right it becomes a bit annoying to always install Java5 just >>> to >>> make a release. >>> >>> Jörn >>> >>> > >
