On 02/21/2013 06:34 AM, jko...@apache.org wrote:
-  public RegexNameFinder(Pattern patterns[]) {
+  public RegexNameFinder(Pattern patterns[], String type) {
      if (patterns == null || patterns.length == 0) {
        throw new IllegalArgumentException("patterns must not be null or 
empty!");
      }
mPatterns = patterns;
+    sType = type;
    }
+ public RegexNameFinder(Pattern patterns[]) {
+    if (patterns == null || patterns.length == 0) {
+      throw new IllegalArgumentException("patterns must not be null or 
empty!");
+    }
+
+    mPatterns = patterns;
+    sType = null;
+  }
+

Thanks for fixing this James. If I am not mistaken, then the second constructor could just call the first one and pass null for the type right? Then we do not need to duplicate the init code.

Jörn

Reply via email to