Yes, the performance testing has to be there, otherwise it is hard to tell if it works or not.
Jörn On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 02:02 +0900, Anthony Beylerian wrote: > Dear Jörn, > > As a first milestone, for now we have the main interface with two > implementations (one unsupervised, one supervised), maybe we can add an > evaluator for performance tests and comparison with the test data we > currently have (SemEval, SensEval test sets). > > Best, > > Anthony > > > Subject: Re: GSoC 2015 - WSD Module > > From: kottm...@gmail.com > > To: dev@opennlp.apache.org > > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:47:22 +0200 > > > > On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 22:13 +0900, Anthony Beylerian wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I attached an initial patch to OPENNLP-758. > > > However, we are currently modifying things a bit since many approaches > > > need to be supported, but would like your recommendations. > > > Here are some notes : > > > > > > 1 - We used extJWNL > > > 2- [WSDisambiguator] is the main interface > > > 3- [Loader] loads the resources required > > > 4- Please check [FeaturesExtractor] for the mentioned methods by Rodrigo. > > > 5- [Lesk] has many variants, we already implemented some, but wondering > > > on the preferred way to switch from one to the other: > > > As of now we use one of them as default, but we thought of either making > > > a parameter list to fill or make separate classes for each, or otherwise > > > following your preference. > > > 6- The other classes are for convenience. > > > > > > We will try to patch frequently on the separate issues, following the > > > feedback. > > > > > > Sounds good, I reviewed it and think what we have is quite ok. > > > > Most important now is to fix the smaller issues (see the jira issue) and > > explain to us how it can be run. > > > > The midterm evaluation is coming up next week as well. > > > > How are we standing with the milstone we set? > > > > Jörn > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
