1. Yes, there are historic reasons, opennlp-tools used to depend on maxent, but maxent didn't depend on opennlp-tools. Therefore maxent couldn't use any opennlp-tools classes. It would be good to open a jira for this and get this re-factored.
2. The cutoff code from GISTrainer should be removed. See issue OPENNLP-123 (half a decade old). PR for that would be very welcome. 3. And when you are it you might be interested to also help us resolve OPENNLP-675. Jörn On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Russ, Daniel (NIH/CIT) [E] < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > The point of PluggableParameters was to move the > “get(Int/String/Boolean)Parmeters” out of AbstractTrainer and into a > parameters. I would like to merge the functionality of PluggableParameters > into trainingParameters. Before I start, is there any reason why the > GISTrainer and the indexer have separate cutoffs? I assume it is just > historic (maybe the trainer used to index), only the larger cutoff is in > effect. > > Daniel > > Daniel Russ, Ph.D. > Staff Scientist, Office of Intramural Research > Center for Information Technology > National Institutes of Health > U.S. Department of Health and Human Services > 12 South Drive > Bethesda, MD 20892-5624 > >
