+1 also pass tests

On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Jeffrey Zemerick <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding) Build and tests pass with no issues.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Joern Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I did run the eval tests and they all run through except one test which
> > needed more memory, that test case has to be adapted to run fast and with
> > much less memory, we should do that for the 1.7.3 release.
> >
> > Jörn
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > The Apache OpenNLP PMC would like to call for a Vote on Apache OpenNLP
> > > 1.7.2
> > > Release Candidate.
> > >
> > > The Release artifacts can be downloaded from:
> > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapacheopennlp-1010/org/apache/opennlp/opennlp-distr/1.7.2/
> > >
> > > The release was made from the Apache OpenNLP 1.7.2 tag at
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/tree/opennlp-1.7.2
> > >
> > > To use it in a maven build set the version for opennlp-tools or
> > > opennlp-uima
> > > to 1.7.2
> > >
> > > and add the following URL to your settings.xml file:
> > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopennlp-1010
> > >
> > > The artifacts have been signed with the Key - D3541808 found at
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/keys/group/opennlp.asc
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.7.2. The
> vote
> > > is
> > >
> > > open for either the next 72 hours or a minimum of 3 +1 PMC binding
> votes
> > > whichever happens earlier.
> > >
> > > Only votes from OpenNLP PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check
> > the
> > >
> > > release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote
> > passes
> > >
> > > if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.7.2
> > >
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> > >
> > > Thanks again to all the committers and contributors for their work
> > > over the past
> > > few weeks.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to