Thanks William. On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 7:38 PM, William Colen <[email protected]> wrote:
> The writer did a mistake by not adding a space after the dot. The sentence > detector model will not know how to deal with it because not very often > there are dots without space splitting sentences. > > This is very common in social network. I apply some regex to check if it is > not a UR, email or number, them add the missing space. > > > > 2017-08-25 9:31 GMT-03:00 Manoj B. Narayanan <manojb.narayanan2011@gmail. > com > >: > > > Hi, > > > > The OpenNLP sentence detector detects sentences when the period at the > end > > of a sentence and the next word are separated by a <space>. If there is > no > > <space> in between it doesn't split them. Is there a way that could help > me > > solve this? > > > > *Example.1* > > > > It is with great pleasure that I write to invite you to the launch of the > > University of Reading’s Centre for Food Security on Thursday 25 November > > 2010.*<space>* The Centre offers a new focus for research on the > challenges > > of meeting global demands for food in a sustainable way. > > > > *Output1* > > It is with great pleasure that I write to invite you to the launch of the > > University of Reading’s Centre for Food Security on Thursday 25 November > > 2010. > > The Centre offers a new focus for research on the challenges of meeting > > global demands for food in a sustainable way. > > > > > > *Example.2* > > > > It is with great pleasure that I write to invite you to the launch of the > > University of Reading’s Centre for Food Security on Thursday 25 November > > 2010.The Centre offers a new focus for research on the challenges of > > meeting global demands for food in a sustainable way. > > > > *Output2* > > It is with great pleasure that I write to invite you to the launch of the > > University of Reading’s Centre for Food Security on Thursday 25 November > > 2010.The Centre offers a new focus for research on the challenges of > > meeting global demands for food in a sustainable way. > > > > Thanks, > > Manoj. > > >
