+1

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Daniel Russ <dr...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Daniel
>
> > On Sep 12, 2017, at 2:37 AM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Tommaso Teofili <
> tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Tommaso
> >>
> >> Il giorno lun 11 set 2017 alle ore 09:12 Joern Kottmann <
> >> kottm...@gmail.com>
> >> ha scritto:
> >>
> >>> Hi Folks,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I have posted a second release candidate for the Apache OpenNLP 1.8.2
> >>> release and it is ready for testing.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The RC 2 distributables can be downloaded from here:
> >>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheopennlp-1018/org/apache/opennlp/opennlp-distr/1.8.2/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The release was made from the Apache OpenNLP 1.8.2 tag at
> >>> https://github.com/apache/opennlp/tree/opennlp-1.8.2
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> To use it in a maven build set the version for opennlp-tools or
> >>> opennlp-uima to 1.8.2 and add the following URL to your settings.xml
> >>> file:
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopennlp-1018
> >>>
> >>> The release was made using the OpenNLP release process, documented on
> >>> the Wiki here:
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENNLP/Release+Process
> >>>
> >>> The release contains quite some changes, please refer to the contained
> >>> issue list for details.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.8.2. The
> vote
> >>> is
> >>> open for at least the next 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Only votes from OpenNLP PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check
> >> the
> >>> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote
> >> passes
> >>> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OpenNLP 1.8.2
> >>> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Jörn
> >>>
> >>> P.S. Here is my +1.
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to