Eric, Could you do a mvn -v and post the results?
Thanks, Jeff On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 2:25 PM Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote: > I got a build error.. maybe the version of Java? > > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache OpenNLP Reactor 2.1.0: > [INFO] > [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Reactor ............................. SUCCESS [ > 2.172 s] > [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Tools ............................... FAILURE [01:04 > min] > [INFO] Apache OpenNLP UIMA Annotators ..................... SKIPPED > [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Brat Annotator ...................... SKIPPED > [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Morfologik Addon .................... SKIPPED > [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Documentation ....................... SKIPPED > [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Distribution ........................ SKIPPED > [INFO] opennlp-dl ......................................... SKIPPED > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [INFO] Total time: 01:07 min > [INFO] Finished at: 2022-11-10T14:23:03-05:00 > [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.1.1:jar > (create-javadoc-jar) on project opennlp-tools: MavenReportException: Error > while generating Javadoc: > [ERROR] Exit code: 1 - javadoc: error - The code being documented uses > packages in the unnamed module, but the packages defined in > https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/docs/api/ are in named modules. > [ERROR] > [ERROR] Command line was: > /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/adoptopenjdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/javadoc > @options @argfile > [ERROR] > [ERROR] Refer to the generated Javadoc files in > '/Users/epugh/Documents/projects/opennlp/opennlp/opennlp-tools/target/apidocs' > dir. > [ERROR] > > > > On Nov 10, 2022, at 1:38 PM, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > thanks for preparing the release! Here is a +1 from my side. > > > > I checked the signatures and the ZIP files & conducted a build > > including tests (no eval tests). Lgtm. > > > > I noticed, that the "jira-report.html" in /issuesFixed in the ZIP > > doesn't contain any items. Don't know, if this is intended, but no > > blocker - guess it needs to be removed or fixed. > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 10.11.2022 um 10:32 -0500 schrieb Jeff Zemerick: > >> I am +1 to release as 2.1.0. > >> > >> Build and tests pass on OpenJDK 11. > >> Eval tests pass (summary below, I have the full log in case anyone > >> wants to > >> see it). > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Jeff > >> > >> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache OpenNLP Reactor 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT: > >> [INFO] > >> [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Reactor ............................. SUCCESS [ > >> 0.573 s] > >> [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Tools ............................... SUCCESS [ > >> 03:37 h] > >> [INFO] Apache OpenNLP UIMA Annotators ..................... SUCCESS [ > >> 1.598 s] > >> [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Brat Annotator ...................... SUCCESS [ > >> 0.398 s] > >> [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Morfologik Addon .................... SUCCESS [ > >> 1.385 s] > >> [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Documentation ....................... SUCCESS [ > >> 0.049 s] > >> [INFO] Apache OpenNLP Distribution ........................ SUCCESS [ > >> 20.903 s] > >> [INFO] opennlp-dl ......................................... SUCCESS [ > >> 6.336 s] > >> [INFO] > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> ----- > >> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > >> [INFO] > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> ----- > >> [INFO] Total time: 03:37 h > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2022-11-01T12:40:53-04:00 > >> [INFO] > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> ----- > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 8:39 AM Jeff Zemerick <jzemer...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi folks, > >>> > >>> I have posted a release candidate for the Apache OpenNLP 2.1.0 > >>> release and > >>> it is ready for testing. > >>> > >>> Changes in this version: > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1370?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENNLP%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(2.1.0)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC > >>> > >>> The distributables can be downloaded from: > >>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1030/org/apache/opennlp/opennlp-distr/2.1.0 > >>> > >>> The release was made from the Apache OpenNLP 2.1.0 tag at: > >>> https://github.com/apache/opennlp/tree/opennlp-2.1.0 > >>> > >>> To use it in a maven build set the version for opennlp-tools or > >>> opennlp-uima to 2.1.0 and add the following URL to your > >>> settings.xml file: > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopennlp-1030 > >>> > >>> The release was made using the OpenNLP release process, documented > >>> on the > >>> website: > >>> https://opennlp.apache.org/release.html > >>> > >>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OpenNLP 2.1.0. > >>> The vote > >>> is open for at least the next 72 hours. > >>> > >>> Only votes from OpenNLP PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to > >>> check > >>> the release candidate and vote. > >>> The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OpenNLP 2.1.0 > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> Jeff > >>> > >>> > > > > _______________________ > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | > http://www.opensourceconnections.com < > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy < > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed < > https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> > > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of > whether attachments are marked as such. > >
