Good point on the breaking changes. Maybe a 2.2 with an introductory paragraph in the announcement email & in the changelog about these breaking changes?
Cheers Bruno On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 18:49, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > I am a big +1 for a release. > > There are some (minor) method signature in it (correcting typos, > removing methods, changing visibility, ...), so it won't be a drop-in > replacement for some users as they need to adjust code. > > If we are fine to ship these changes in a patch version (and not in a > new minor version), we can go with 2.1.1 > > Gruß > Richard > > > > Am Mittwoch, dem 11.01.2023 um 10:29 -0500 schrieb Jeff Zemerick: > > Hi everyone, > > > > Since the last release (2.1.0) back in November, we have had 56 > > closed Jira > > tickets. Scrolling through them, I see lots of improvements to > > documentation, Javadocs, tests, code quality, refactoring, and a few > > minor > > fixes. > > > > Because I don't see any new features, I would like to propose a > > release > > vote for OpenNLP 2.1.1. I'm super excited that the project is in a > > position > > to consider another release and a big thanks to everyone who > > contributed! > > > > If I'm overlooking anything that would warrant a 2.2.0 release > > instead of > > 2.1.1 please let me know! Here's the Jira query for the current > > changes in > > 2.1.1: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1320?jql=project%20%3D%20OPENNLP%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.1%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC > > > > Let me know what you think! > > > > Thanks, > > Jeff > >
