Hello everybody, I note that there were no additional comments or objections to OpenNLP-1496. For obvious reasons, I’m also +1 with it.
This gives the move to Java 17 and the associated PR 535 (https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/535) a five +1 votes (Richard, Atita, Jeff, Bruno, Martin). Therefore, I will now proceed and merge this PR to the main branch. Best regards Martin On 2023/06/05 15:47:13 Richard Zowalla wrote: > +1 > > Am Montag, dem 05.06.2023 um 15:43 +0000 schrieb Martin Wiesner: > > Thanks Richard, Atita & Jeff for the feedback. > > > > I think we should encourage others to share their opinion(s). > > I'd like to propose we continue to collect further comments until at > > least Friday, 9 June 2023. If no other opinions/comments arise, I'd > > assume "lazy consensus" on PR 535 by the (dev) community. > > > > On the following Saturday, June 10, 2023, we can then reach a > > conclusion and take a decision. > > > > Thanks, > > Martin > > > > On 2023/06/04 15:28:28 Jeff Zemerick wrote: > > > I'm also a +1. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jeff > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:08 AM Atita Arora <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 from my side ! > > > > Let's move with time, :) I wonder if we have use cases where we > > > > need to > > > > support backward compatibility. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 12:31 PM Martin Wiesner > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone else have feedback or wants to share his/her > > > > > opinion > > > > regarding > > > > > the move to Java 17? > > > > > > > > > > Best > > > > > Martin > > > > > — > > > > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne > > > > > https://github.com/mawiesne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2023/05/30 18:05:28 Richard Zowalla wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, dem 30.05.2023 um 16:49 +0200 schrieb Martin > > > > > > Wiesner: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time progresses and Java 11 LTS is set to be EOL with 30 > > > > > > > Sep 2023 > > > > > > > (see: https://endoflife.date/java). Therefore, some days > > > > > > > ago, I’ve > > > > > > > opened OPENNLP-1496, proposing to migrate OpenNLP’s > > > > > > > codebase to Java > > > > > > > 17 LTS, see: > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1496. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The (official) EOL date will hit pretty soon. With that in > > > > > > > mind, the > > > > > > > project should consider to migrate the build and target JDK > > > > > > > towards > > > > > > > the next LTS release, that is: Java 17. This will be > > > > > > > supported until > > > > > > > at least 30 Sep 2026. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The primary aims that I identified are: > > > > > > > - Keep pace with the Java ecosystem, > > > > > > > - Modernizes the code base with new(er) language features, > > > > > > > - Benefit by performance enhancements and fixes provided > > > > > > > with 17.x > > > > > > > LTS. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A PR that demonstrates that all build steps (GH actions) > > > > > > > are green, > > > > > > > and no blockers occur, is already available here: > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/535 > > > > > > > and received some feedback. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With that being said, I’d like reach out here on the > > > > > > > list(s) and to > > > > > > > get your opinions on moving on to J17. Open for (m)any > > > > > > > comments. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > mawiesne > > > > > > > — > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne > > > > > > > https://github.com/mawiesne > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
