hi, Thanks for initiating this discussion regarding the future version scheme for our OpenNLP Maven module distribution. Personally, I lean towards option (a) as it establishes a fresh starting point for our Maven module distribution. However, I'm open to hearing others' thoughts and considerations.
Best, Atita On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 8:31 AM Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > From my point of view, we are not releasing models as often as we release > opennlp-tools. > And pushing a new version without having actual changes in supplied > models, looks somehow odd to me. > So personally, I would be in favor for having a separate versioning scheme > for it. > > Gruß > Richard > > > > Am 27.05.2024 um 21:56 schrieb Bruno Kinoshita <brunodepau...@gmail.com > >: > > > > Hi! > > > > Thanks for starting this! I do not have a preference for a, b, or c, as > > long as it's explained/documented to users, I think they will be happy to > > be able to see the model in their dependency tree. > > > > Thank you! > > > > On Mon, 27 May 2024 at 16:15, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> with [1] we will make a step forward in order to distrubute OpenNLP > models > >> via Maven Central. > >> While we still need to integrate all other models, Martin (W.) raised > the > >> valid question about the future version scheme of our opennlp maven > module > >> distribution. > >> > >> Do we want to > >> > >> - (a) Start with 1.0 > >> - (b) Align with the version of the opennlp-tools > >> - (c) Something else > >> > >> Any ideas, thoughts, comments? > >> > >> Gruß > >> Richard > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/opennlp-models/pull/1 > >> > >
