FYI: Have invited the user list last week: 
https://lists.apache.org/thread/wgj7oovl4ls7pmpbvbc9hoo895whjpd5

On 2025/02/13 11:35:49 Martin Wiesner wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> thanks Bruno for sharing your thoughts.
> 
> Obviously, I’m a +1 for the idea of a more modularized form of opennlp core 
> components, see Richard's original post.
> 
> To get things rolling, I’d suggest:
> The feedback and early conceptual phase could be open until say March 1st 
> 2025. Thoughts? 
> 
> Any more feedback is highly welcome. Should we, in addition, share the 
> modularization proposal (3.x) on the users list so the community can join the 
> discussion? 
> 
> Please participate in this discussion, especially if you are a senior 
> committer and/or PMC member of the OpenNLP project.
> 
> Gruß
> Martin
> —
> 
> > Am 09.02.2025 um 10:09 schrieb Bruno Kinoshita <brunodepau...@gmail.com>:
> > 
> > Sounds like a good plan, especially "We also aim to maintain backward
> > compatibility" 👍
> > +1
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > 
> > On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 11:06, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi,
> >> 
> >> Martin and I were sitting on the ICE from Berlin back to Heilbronn and had
> >> a discussion about modernizing OpenNLP's module structure.
> >> We also discussed that idea with Atita off-list in Berlin two days ago :-)
> >> 
> >> Our main goal is to split the CLI parts and define a solid API module,
> >> along with well-structured dependent modules something like „api“, „cli“,
> >> „core“, „addons“, ...
> >> 
> >> We also aim to maintain backward compatibility for the CLI, ensuring that
> >> users can still grab the distribution binary or „opennlp-tools“ via Maven
> >> as before.
> >> 
> >> By implementing these changes, we believe OpenNLP will become more
> >> modular, flexible, and easier to maintain.
> >> This should make it easier to integrate OpenNLP into core libraries while
> >> improving maintainability for future use cases.
> >> 
> >> Our proposal would be, that we start with OpenNLP 3.x on a separate branch
> >> to try things out and call this a step towards the 3.x series of OpenNLP.
> >> 
> >> WDYT?
> >> 
> >> Gruß
> >> Richard
> 
> 

Reply via email to