I thought we need to vote on if we accept the agents file (per the review)


On Fri, Oct 16, 2026, 2:36 PM Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> wrote:

> The header says this is a vote, but there is nothing to vote on ;-)
> I assume it is a discussion?
>
> > Am 16.10.2026 um 15:56 schrieb Kristian Rickert <[email protected]>:
> >
> > This email requests a vote on the AGENTS.md PR here:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/1470
> >
> > This is the initial draft.  It is a file for LLMs that all the frontier
> > apps read.  It does not promise that LLMs will adhere to the AGENTS.md,
> but
> > they "usually" do.
> >
> > Per Martin's advice, I suggest extending this to everyone: avoid
> > overthinking or over-engineering.  The Linux kernel is dropping the rule
> to
> > include "assisted by" for a multitude of reasons. Also, keep in mind
> > that it's concise because we want to avoid sending too many tokens.
> >
> > Below is for reference in case you're not familiar with AGENTS.md; we
> > already have a discussion thread, but feel free to discuss here or in the
> > PR itself.  I'll summarize everything on this thread as we go along.
> > Official Spec
> >
> > https://agents.md/
> > Claude's take
> >
> > If CLAUDE.md doesn't exist, it will treat AGENTS.md the same way:
> >
> > https://code.claude.com/docs/en/memory
> > OpenAI's take
> >
> > https://learn.chatgpt.com/docs/agent-configuration/agents-md
> > Lucene's take
> >
> > We did take inspiration from lucene's AI Policy but theirs is for humans,
> > and AGENTS.md is for machine:
> > apache/lucene@c94ed04
> > <
> https://github.com/apache/lucene/commit/c94ed045b8a107aef4c2c07eafad42e7b82dbda6
> >
> >
> >
> > *Linux Foundation's recent take*
> >
> > https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Dropping-Assisted-By-Req
> >
> >
> > Before commenting, I ask that we read some of the above guidelines to
> > understand what the file should and should not contain.
> >
> > Keep in mind, I suspect this will be a moving target - so having
> something
> > is better than nothing.
> >
> > Again - this file is for machines to read.  Not humans.  So that's why
> it's
> > slightly chunked, follows guidelines, and includes nearly everything we
> > discussed on the discussion thread.
> >
> > Kristian
>
>

Reply via email to