On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:54 PM, jan iversen <j...@apache.org> wrote:
> If I may say so, based on my experience, we should not go too much into
> details about versions, this is about having a heterogeneous environment,
> something that most IT departments try to avoid at all cost, and AOO just
> happened to be the excuse for making the structure slimmer. In my opinion a
> response telling that a newer version is better, would actually catch bad
> press, whereas a response (if possible with some equal success stories)
> showing why it is not a problem to have AOO and MS-OFFICE side by side,
> would catch a positive interest.
>
> We need the thumbs up from the IT department, and that is not accomplished
> by telling them they should have upgraded.
>
> But apart from that, I agree that we should make a coordinated response, if
> possible with other OO derivates.
>

Part of the problem is that this is being whipped up in the media by
the MS partner community.  So the coverage is disproportionate.

Consider:

Leipzig, Germany has population of 530,000.  On September 9th they
announced that they had moved from Microsoft Office to OpenOffice and
had installed OpenOffice on 3900 of their desktops.

Freiburg, Germany has a population of 230,000.  On November 20th they
announced that they were moving from OpenOffice.org to Microsoft
Office on their 2000 desktops.

Google shows 337 stories for the Freiburg story.  But did you see a
mention of the Leipzig story?  I saw a few, but even though it was the
larger migration, I saw only brief mentions.

-Rob

> Jan.
>
>
> On 21 November 2012 19:35, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On 21/11/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> Freiburg putting the blame for the challenges of managing
>>> heterogeneous IT systems solely on an old version of OpenOffice.org is
>>> wrong and unfair, IMHO.  But it is common.
>>>
>>
>> Indeed this is quite common. But, if in this case we have reasons to
>> believe that better practices or using current/future versions of Apache
>> OpenOffice would yield better results, it would be excellent to prepare and
>> publish a coordinated response, since this news item was featured in many
>> online technology news sites in the last few days.
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Andrea.
>>

Reply via email to