Hi, all,
  I updated the planning wiki and moved most proposed feature/enhancement
with no owner from
<http://4.0>4.0<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Planning>to
4.1<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1+Release+Planning>.
  And I left "Encryption GUI" still in 4.0 for now, since TJ is discussing
the UI design and trying to get developer volunteer for this item. So I
suggest we revisit this item later (January?).

  Next, I'd like our owners to double check the following proposed items
and confirm if each of them can/should be in 4.0 (current target is to
release in April 2013). Again, I will move out those having no confirmation
after 1 week. (of course, any one is free to propose them back any time).

enhanced extensions manager     The extensions manager should support
multiple repositories. Either via UI or via configuration only.     - jsc
OpenSocial support     Enable 'sharing' to OpenSocial container's Activity
Streams for document, chart, or spreadsheet review & comment     - Kevin
Grignon (UX design)
MacOS support with Java dropped          - Herbert Duerr
Usability improvement in Ctrl+A and mouse operations in tables and sections
    - Cheng Jian Hong
Interoperability improvement with MS Word 2007/2010 on Shape support  -
Zhang Ying
XLS loading performance with multiple pivot tables  - Wang Lei
Speaker notes support in normal view   - Chen Jin Hua
Include ODF Toolkit    - robweir

  Thanks!


- Shenfeng (Simon)



2012/12/8 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com>

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 12/7/12 3:18 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:55:23AM -0500, TJ Frazier wrote:
> >> The "Encryption GUI" item has not attracted a sponsor. I added
> >> this per the resolution of a very long discussion in BZ [1].
> >> Subsequently, Jürgen wrote an extension to set "SHA256" mode, and
> >> I wrote a macro[2] to toggle the settings; both are still
> >> available.  (I have no idea whether any or many users have used
> >> them.)
> >>
> >> [1] <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119090#c31>
> >>
> >> [2] <http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/User:TJFrazier/Encryption>
> >> (this page includes text suitable for release notes)
> >>
> >> If somebody wants to pick up on this, and implement a GUI
> >> (probably in Tools > Options, possibly on the Save and Save As
> >> dialogs), that's wonderful. Lacking all fu for SVN and C++, I
> >> can't volunteer for this.
> >
> > the best way is to start a new thread asking for UX advice where
> > to include the option. IMHO the Save dialogs are a no-go, the
> > average user will have no idea what this means.
> >
> > On the other hand, Tools > Options > Load/Save > General has almost
> > no space to add anything else, but may be a new "Encryption"
> > options page is an overhead...
> >
>
> Mmh, maybe directly over the "Size optimization ..." checkbox.
>
> I have thought initially about Tools -> Options -> OpenOffice.org ->
> Security. There should be enough place for a checkbox with some
> explanation.
>
> Juergen
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQwhb+AAoJEM/u8xZRtf3oP2EP/jOzchb2sy8C+Pat1hygnzP8
> CHreoVW2K7Zgmxs9WPsAuhz6NEH6dhmwg2kHQsh+rP/6FbkXtcKdVuUavKF8JqqW
> SlqKIu52Od6c2DBznhX3yEjj2/qcUOEOGL303TEXnINIxOYc4Xr2jbInbsB6Weaq
> +RoxTUvRLIrP9l6j0iXR7GLmM2CKokKH6fzPXYn2jAVsYSMh9oeT55xTgOjww72m
> ZS6/6FZdAtsjTplqDGUqsDcAZXOVd+qhjBHLFxzFEAsE0gQzKglKKZJsszZ6EcIj
> b4PgpHfIHrkvcuIHOe0O+aDrxd0lwuYBONFHb9hA4+4JHi+rBnLHDxHAUkbHljC1
> IHNXxYJP+d8Sb7VDHuKilqxlefZtrTJAqbcIveY0sONPQBSm+8NluxN4p26ko+RZ
> TYXJEOHe4Xvz6FvG4bLyD2A2JwxgVLf8kVk/sayM3/x+QD+X0RLEUDQa4EhWYGdi
> CugUxj0jbIyvumvY2EIslxQetMGuykeRmDw62jvAu65XFaquKuPaIbDmP/gpFISx
> d+3dYO43wUVnCfrEQY1b3dJijSQbgjsC6GTr6JVF+YxcjNfJOIAe3gjvZsJal63X
> v4UJVwQpVDm/eLpyH+YT4M6wEPz0a1f9N+zgRcdXVIOEH0lrVckHmM3bUjeUTyjp
> GEb0OnjoK5eCGCfvUNx7
> =Q2xu
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

Reply via email to