TJ Frazier wrote:
On 1/30/2013 16:54, RGB ES wrote:
Good! The proposal was noticed by Phoronix too :)
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTI4ODI
It got more coverage than needed, probably. It is just a proposal at
this stage, like dozens of other proposals.
Note that the article says that AOO 4.0 is scheduled for "April, 2012".
Oops.
Thanks, this is due to a typo I did in the wiki page, now fixed by
Jaroslav Reznik, the so-called "Feature Wrangler", who manages the
proposal lifecycle. But it probably propagated via sloppy copy-paste to
articles before Jaroslav fixed it.
Note that Jaroslav opened a dedicated thread on the Fedora devel list
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/thread.html
(search "OpenOffice") and that I already incorporated into
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApacheOpenOffice
some suggestions that came from there: using expressions more neutral
than "leading free and open-source office suite" (I replaced it with
"extremely popular", it was copied from our website and it is irrelevant
to the application, since OpenOffice is well-known enough) and a
historical remark by Caolan McNamara about the period when Fedora
packaged ooo-build instead of the standard OpenOffice.
Regards,
Andrea.
