2013/7/29 Roberto Galoppini <roberto.galopp...@gmail.com>

>
>
>
> 2013/7/27 Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
>
>> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Roberto Galoppini
>> <roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > 2013/7/27 Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org>
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Hagar Delest <
>> hagar.del...@laposte.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Le 26/07/2013 15:40, Roberto Galoppini a écrit :
>> >> >
>> >> >> A) a link to a version compatible with AOO 4.0 has been added for
>> >> >> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/pdfimport and
>> >> >> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/mysql_connector
>> >> >>
>> >> >> B) 4.0" has been added to the list of possible compatibilities. For
>> >> >> example
>> >> >> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/node/287/releases doesn't
>> enlist
>> >> 4.0
>> >> >> among AOO compatible versions, while new extensions have that set,
>> see
>> >> for
>> >> >> example http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/node/5644/releases.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Note that it's up to the author to indicate his/her extension
>> >> >> compatibility
>> >> >> list, and he/she can update it without the need to upload the file
>> >> again.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > But it means that the author has to be aware that there is a change
>> and
>> >> he
>> >> > has to update the relevant field.
>> >> > There is no script that could add the lack of compatibility if the
>> >> extension
>> >> > has not been updated yet?
>> >>
>> >
>> > The lack of compatibility is somehow implicit if you read that a given
>> > extension is compatible with OpenOffice 3.3 or AOO 3.4 and it doesn't
>> > mention AOO 4.0. See below about how to make sure such info is
>> up-to-date.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> > For the record, in the case of the Lorem ipsum extension, the author
>> >> doesn't
>> >> > seem to be willing to update it...
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> If an extension is essentially abandoned then it is only a matter of
>> >> time before it breaks.  Either that or we put ourselves into a
>> >> position where we can never evolve and improve our API.  We should
>> >> focus on the needs of active extension developers, not the inactive
>> >> ones.
>> >>
>> >> This is what we did to keep extension authors in the loop:
>> >>
>> >> 1) We created a special mailing list, a...@openoffice.apache.org for
>> >> discussions about extensions.
>> >>
>> >> 2) We worked with SourceForge to send an email to all registered
>> >> extension authors to invite them to the new list.  This was done
>> >> before the *.openoffice.org email forwarder was shut down, so they all
>> >> should have received the note.
>> >>
>> >
>> > We might resend an email to all Extensions' authors re-inviting them to
>> > subscribe to the API mailing-list and also inviting them to check if
>> their
>> > extensions do work with AOO 4.0 and eventually update their extension
>> page
>> > accordingly.
>> >
>> > Does it sound like a plan?
>> >
>>
>> Reminders are good.
>>
>
> So what do we want to tell them, does anyone want to craft a draft message
> for AOOE authors?
>


Subject: About Apache OpenOffice New Release and Updating your Extension's
Compatibility Info

Dear OpenOffice.org Extensions author,

As you may have heard, Apache OpenOffice 4.0 is now out, and we'd like to
invite you to test your own extension and figure out if it is or is not
compatible with Apache OpenOffice 4.0 and its new APIs.

If your extension is compatible with AOO 4.0, please take a moment to
update the extension's compatibility information so that end-users will
know it works with the latest release. If your extension is not compatible
we'd encourage you to release a new version if you have time, or ask people
to help you with that at the API mailing-list (http://openoffice.apache
.org/mailing-lists.html#api-mailing-list-public).

How do you like this?

Roberto



>
> Roberto
>
>
>
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>> > Roberto
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> 3) We announce the 4.0 API changes on the API list and answered any
>> >> questions that came up.
>> >>
>> >> True, not everyone is happy about the changes.  But we tried to ensure
>> >> that every active extension author was aware of the changes coming.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> -Rob
>> >>
>> >> > Hagar
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> >> >
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to