I think the image structure on the website is a bit messy, there has been some cleanup done by kschenk but I think there is still a lot of clean up work to be done.
For example, the new logo, was simply draged and drop to the AOOLogos folder with a huge name. I understand the name was needed to identify it between the rest of the competitive logos. But now that is selected, the current name is unecessary long. Apache_OpenOffice_Logo_ChrisR_selected_2013-06_optim_300w.png<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/Apache_OpenOffice_Logo_ChrisR_selected_2013-06_optim_300w.png?view=log> At the same time we have old logos which had been untouch. I think the webdevs have small understanding of a svn is builted so that the files are updated without having different versions laying arround. Over this example, ooo-logo.png and AOO4_website_logo.png<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/AOO4_website_logo.png?view=log>exist. All these proliferation of logos, usually will built up to become incredibly messy to work. I suggest to put the information such as author, version, status, etc. on the comments of the commit and not on the filename. Likewise to take the time to look for the source of the image, since there is an SVG/ folder to link the source of them, and finally if there are different images (sizes) to have a common convention. If you want to review the images please go here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ooo-site/trunk/content/images/AOO_logos/ -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org
