On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Herbert Duerr <h...@apache.org> wrote: > On 24.03.2014 15:36, Herbert Duerr wrote: >> >> On 24.03.2014 15:13, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On 24 March 2014 13:51, Herbert Duerr <h...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 23.03.2014 09:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> sebb wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> There is still an SVN tree under Incubator: >>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ >>>>>> I assume this was all transferred to the main ASF SVN area at >>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ >>>>>> If so, please can someone tidy up the Incubator tree? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It was indeed all transferred, and the old copy made read-only by >>>>> Infra. >>>>> It wasn't deleted since we still had releases and documentation around >>>>> that referred to the Incubator. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> There are still many e.g. Wiki pages that reference the incubator >>>> locations. >>>> I updated some of them but there are still plenty left, e.g. about the >>>> branch aw080, netbeans, OOXML, etc. >>>> >>>> I suggest to update them to their new location at >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice >>>> For links that should continue to point into the incubator directory, >>>> e.g. >>>> because the branch was integrated and removed at the new location SVN >>>> offers >>>> the possibility to reference older branches using the >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/!svn/bc/1555555/incubator/ooo/trunk/ >>>> notation. >>> >>> >>> Although that should work, I think it could be confusing. >>> >>> IMO it would be better to find the appropriate entry in the new SVN >>> layout. >>> If there is no such entry, is there really a need to keep the >>> reference to the incubator-only SVN tree? >> >> >> I mostly agree. For the pages that I already updated I was able to >> change all references to their new repository location. >> >> But for sub-project specific pages the status is not always obvious >> which alternative would be most suitable: >> - update them to their new repository location >> - keep the link into the incubator location >> - are the pages are still relevant or could/should they be deleted. >> AFAIK it is not easy to resurrect deleted Wiki pages, so doing that on >> still somewhat interesting pages would be a net loss. >> >> The best solution would be to check the problematic pages and their >> links. So if anyone has more insight into their status please update them: >> A quick google search found pages about the "object inspector >> extension", the "netbeans" extension, the "aw080" branch, OOXML, etc. > > > A closer examination showed that the problematic links had counterparts in > the post-graduation repository location and the text around these links > didn't indicate a special dependency, so I'm confident that it was OK to > update them, which I just did. > > So if the next 72 hours indicate consensus on removing the incubator/ooo > part of the repository I suggest that we should do so. The code history is > already preserved in our git-import. >
The only issue would be if anyone is doing LTS on 3.40 or 3.4.1, right? Didn't those versions go back to SVN to pick up the binary dependencies? -Rob > Herbert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
