Same symptom. And the shortcut named "OpenOffice 4.0.1" is still on the desktop. But these old version stuffs can be removed manually.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Yuzhen Fan <fanyuz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Could you please report it in bugzilla and help to confirm if it has the > same problem when install 4.0.1 over an existing 4.0.0? Thanks! > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino <pedl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all > > > > First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update > > patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would > > never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers! > > > > I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing > > 4.0.1) with en_US and PT under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3 en_US. > > > > Overall everything seems to be working perfectly but there is a small > > quirk: the Startup Group for 4.0.1 is not removed so you end up with two > > startup groups with different names pointing at the same folder. > > > > In addition the OpenOffice logo shows on the 4.0.1 group but not on the > > 4.1.0. > > > > I know these are small cosmetic problems but could be confusing for > users. > > > > I can create a bugzilla report if necessary. > > > > Regards, > > Pedro > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Yuzhen Fan <fanyuz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Steve for your verification on installation of new package on > > en_US. > > > > > > From testing perspective: > > > 1. The repackage changes nothing on functions, so previous and ongoing > > > tests are still valid and there is no need for retesting. > > > 2. But we need to retest the installation for below two typical > scenarios > > > on all language packages > > > - Clean install 4.1.0 with no existing versions(e.g. 4.0.1) > > > - Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Steve Yin <steve.yin....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > No problem found. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Steve Yin <steve.yin....@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's great to hear that. I am going to try the new package now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Jürgen Schmidt < > > jogischm...@gmail.com > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> On 4/3/14 6:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > > >> > On 4/3/14 5:43 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > > >> >> On 4/3/14 5:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > > >> >>> ATTENTION: we have to repackage the windows builds, the vote > > will > > > > >> >>> continue because we change nothing, just repackage the install > > > > >> packages > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> I have built with the release=t flag to be prepared for future > > > > patches > > > > >> >>> that will allow us for example to upgrade a 4.1 or 4.2 to an > > 4.3. > > > > The > > > > >> >>> whole mechanism is very complex and it seems that we have > > > overseen a > > > > >> >>> small detail. No big thing we just have to rebuild for now and > > > have > > > > to > > > > >> >>> test the patch mechanism a little bit more. > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> That means also that the msp have to be used even more > careful. > > > They > > > > >> >>> work to upgrade a 4.0.1 to a 4.1 but the next msp for a > > potential > > > > 4.2 > > > > >> or > > > > >> >>> 4.1.1 can't be applied to a patched 4.0.1. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> The current problem is that the new full install sets can't be > > > > >> installed > > > > >> >> over an existing 4.0.1 this. Something that we don't want for > now > > > ;-) > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I will delete the full install sets now to avoid further > > confusion. > > > > Stay > > > > >> > tuned probably tomorrow the new builds are available. > > > > >> > > > > >> Ok, Windows full install sets are replaced. I wish you all happy > > > testing > > > > >> and voting and will be back on Monday. > > > > >> > > > > >> We have only repackaged that means the about dialog will contain > the > > > > >> same values as before. > > > > >> > > > > >> Juergen > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Juergen > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> Juergen > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> Juergen > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > > > >> >>>> Hi, > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO > 4.1 > > > > >> release. > > > > >> >>>> We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to > fix > > > some > > > > >> >>>> further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to > propose a > > > > >> first RC > > > > >> >>>> based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a > > lot > > > of > > > > >> time > > > > >> >>>> in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The > > MacOS > > > > and > > > > >> >>>> Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload > is > > > > still > > > > >> >>>> ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience > and > > > the > > > > >> >>>> release relevant bits are the source release. > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> The RC builds can be found as always under > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going > > > into > > > > >> this > > > > >> >>>> release can be found under > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html > > > . > > > > >> >>>> I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the > > > fixed > > > > >> >>>> issues. Especially the issues related to translation > > > updates/fixes > > > > >> >>>> should be verified by native speakers. > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> A related RAT scan can be found under > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the > > > > languages > > > > >> we > > > > >> >>>> have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for > > > private > > > > >> use > > > > >> >>>> only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's > > the > > > > >> first > > > > >> >>>> time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have > to > > > test > > > > >> the > > > > >> >>>> functionality a little bit more. The related full install > sets > > > are > > > > >> >>>> prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in > > the > > > > >> future > > > > >> >>>> as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded > > AOO > > > > >> 4.0.1 > > > > >> >>>> (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-) > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run > > > until > > > > >> >>>> Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits > > > > >> careful. > > > > >> >>>> Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest. > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers > > > because > > > > >> they > > > > >> >>>> were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should > > take > > > > into > > > > >> >>>> account that we have limited resources in the project able to > > fix > > > > >> >>>> issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers > > and > > > on > > > > >> >>>> those who are relevant for most of our users. > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>>> Juergen > > > > >> >>>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Steve Yin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > Steve Yin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards, > > > Yu Zhen > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Yu Zhen > -- Best Regards, Steve Yin
