On 4/29/14 9:20 AM, Tal Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Apr 29, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> I propose that, once a language reaches our release quality criteria >> (currently: UI translation at 100% and maintained), we do not drop it >> afterwards for the other minor releases. >> >> [...] I would remove unmaintained languages only when version 5.0 comes. >> > > Seems reasonable, to me, Andrea, I'm not sure that removing a language on > major release should be so strict. What about removing a language only when > a MINIMUM% of it isn't translated (e.g., 10%)? >
we had something like this before but defined a new rule to be 100% UI complete and I think this is quite easy and a good rule. The case Andrea described above should be more theoretical if an active community is behind a translation. We released Arabic with 3.4 but there was no active community and nothing happened later on. I would still prefer the 100% rule. But anyway it's my personal opinion. Juergen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
