Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I think the observation about long file names has to do with
these, e.g.,
d6eef4b4cacb2183f2bf265a5a03a354-boost_1_55_0.tar.bz2
which make the page unreadable because the CSS forces the Name
column to be too narrow to see the full names.
Indeed. I appreciate the effort to shorten the SF project name, but the
main issue is with the long filenames. It is not so much the URL, but
the content of
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/?source=directory
that is mostly unreadable at the moment. Compare to the (more basic, but
more readable in our case) layout of
https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-extras/downloads/list
So long as these are meant to be fetched by scripts running
in builds, this is the way it is going to be.
Exactly. We use the MD5 hash as part of the name to verify the integrity
of the downloaded package.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
