2015-06-23 0:49 GMT+02:00 Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com>: > > > On 06/21/2015 11:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > On 21/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: > >> yes, they would be...based on the buildbot failure alone, I think the SF > >> mirror must have been deactivated just a day or so ago. > > > > Could it be that this is an unintended consequence of SourceForge's new > > policy when they decided, for transparency towards the community, to > > avoid mirrors that had not been asked for? > > > http://sourceforge.net/blog/project-mirroring-policies-will-be-revisited-with-our-community-panel-existing-mirrors-removed/ > > > > > > It seems clear that > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/ was definitely > > to be kept (or, while at it, we could have it relocated to > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras/ or something else like > > apache-extras-openoffice). > > Oh my! I did not see/hear about this. Given the June 18 notice, yes, I > would certainly say this applies to AOO and why the mirror service was > stopped. >
Yes, that is the reason. Do we need to reinstate the project, and if that's the case who would be the administrator/s? Let me know and I'll get it fixed, really sorry for the annoyance. Roberto > > OK, I'm looking specifically at this paragraph from the link you sent-- > > "Mirrors which are not co-maintained with the one or more of the > original developers, except where the upstream site has been > discontinued, have been removed effective immediately. An extensive > review has been conducted of the 295 mirrored projects and removals were > completed on June 18th. Where a SourceForge-maintained mirror has been > removed, we have redirected this traffic back to the canonical home for > the software (whence it was mirrored to begin with)." > > Basically since "ooo-extras" are copies with md5 sums applied for our > own uses, and we are NOT the original developers, this would definitely > apply. > > In most cases, we have the provider links to these items listed as URL1 > in /main/external_deps.lst. So, should we just change this file to use > URL1 as default and forget ooo-extras altogether? > > We would need to see how this affects configuration which I've had > problems with in the past when these sources haven't bee kept up to date > in /ext_sources. It's likely we would need some alternate verification > method. > > > > > > > >>> The direct download from > >>> http://www.ijg.org/files/jpegsrc.v8d.tar.gz > >>> and > >>> http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.6/Python-2.7.6.tgz > >>> works for me. I don't know why it doesn't work for bootstrap. > > > > At times, the first download fails since the .gz file is uncompressed > > during download. So basically you download file.tar.gz and what you get > > is a file named "file.tar.gz" but with the contents of "file.tar" (and > > thus a different md5sum). If someone wants to hack the Perl file or file > > this in an issue it would be perfect. But the fallback always worked, so > > this hasn't been high priority. > > > > Regards, > > Andrea. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > -- > -------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "We can all sleep easy at night knowing that > somewhere at any given time, > the Foo Fighters are out there fighting Foo." > -- David Letterman > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
