> On Jan 5, 2021, at 7:51 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 05.01.21 um 13:29 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Should we try for a RC1 early next week?
> 
> I didn't hear any response regarding this issue yet:
> 
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128413 
> <https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128413>

This was handled by making fakeroot required:

    
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/4975252caf49bc46c383c6cef330cb927a635806

> 
> And how about the logos? Leave the anniversary edition or revert?

I think we all agreed to revert.

> 
> Other than that, next week would be OK for me.
> 
> Matthias
> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 27, 2020, at 8:49 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The AOO419 branch has been created.
>>> The version numbers, et.al. have been bumped.
>>> The Release Status page has been cloned: 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.9
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org>

Reply via email to