Hi Pedro, Am 30.05.21 um 19:42 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Andrea > > Thank you for the links. FontAwesome requires a paid license to have access > to the SVGs so I guess that excludes it. > Personally I would avoid using something from Google so my choice would be > Remixicon. But I think we need to check which one has the most complete set. > Maybe we need a combination of both themes.
I would never want to combine two different icon sets... But for Remixicon: It is open source and icons can be added/requested on GitHub. https://github.com/Remix-Design/remixicon Regards, Matthias > > Grazie mille! > Pedro > >> On 05/30/2021 8:51 AM Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Pedro Lino wrote: >>>>> On 05/29/2021 9:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>>>> https://remixicon.com/ >>>> This one is really interesting! Can you share the links to other >>>> projects that you have found? >>> FontAwesome https://fontawesome.com/license/free is really popular and >>> CC-BY (but recent versions include a "Pro" section that may have >>> different terms). >>> >>> Google's Material Design Icons ... are >>> AL2, come in different styles and, although the set is already quite >>> comprehensive, are extended by community projects. >> I copy-pasted the same link twice... the correct link to Google's >> Material Design Icons is https://fonts.google.com/icons >> >> Regards, >> Andrea. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
