On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 11:52 +0100, Joerg Barfurth wrote: > Please go ahead and file an issue. But I can't see why such a bug needs > to be announced as 'HEAD breakage' on the general dev list.
I only identify that a build breaks because of the variability of the HEAD being buildable I cannot determine whether this is a valid problem hence the email. I started raising bug reports and this wasted resources, this was a suggested compromise with RE. The alternative is for RE to constantly monitor http://ooo.ximian.com tinderbox on HEAD to ensure that they have indeed picked up the problems and notify the builder when they see problems that RE is not going to address. I would be happier with this suggestion as it reduces the perception of 'constantly broken because of the emails' which is what a tinderbox is supposed to do. Finally I have built with an available option for configure that RE does not test therefore my tinderbox is ensuring that OOo builds for everyone not just the standard cases. I am pleased we have picked up a bug as a result, my time is well spent stopping someone else have this problem. -- Ken Foskey OpenOffice.org developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
