Hi,
sorry, could not resist...
>>Sorry for the (may be stupid) question, but why not just change
>>OSL_VERIFY to emit nothing, in case OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL == 0? I would expect
>>that only weird code would relay on the evaluation in case of a zero
>>debug level.
>
> Why "weird"? The alternative is something like
> #if OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 0
> bool result =
> #endif
> callSomeFooWhichSignalsSuccess( bar );
> OSL_ENSURE( result, "this was expected to succeed!" );
In a non-"weird" language with a cute compiler, the natural way of
expressing this would be:
bool(ean) result = callSomeFooWhichSignalsSuccess( bar );
if (OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL > 0) {
OSL_ENSURE(result, "this was expected to succeed!");
}
Where OSL_DEBUG_LEVEL is something that can be determined at comile
time.
But, of cause, I may have misunderstood the problem...
> I definately think that
> OSL_VERIFY( callSomeFooWhichSignalsSuccess( bar ) );
> is the better (non-weird) alternative here.
Regards
Bernhard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
