Daniel Boelzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to present/discuss a recent helper I have developed which IMO > simplifies the implementation of UNO services in C++ a lot. > > [...] > > So what do you think? Comments, please. > Great stuff! Always having to write so much boilerplate has gotten to my nerves.
One nit: since the automatic implementation name derivation looks kind of fragile (and most of the time, I _do_ declare my service implementations in anonymous namespaces) - how about disabling that feature by default? I have the impression that not much of OOo development outside Sun takes place on Windows, and specifying one (more) string at the constructor is really not that much overhead... Cheers, -- Thorsten If you're not failing some of the time, you're not trying hard enough. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
