From: KAMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 21:48:52 +0200
> The license issues under eliminating :o) The templates that seem > problematic is undel LGPL or PDL... I will check files from > OpenOffice.org EXTRAS CD (that downloadable from Openoffice.org) but > they use ooextras, openoffice.org stuffs so the are free. Fonts are > free, Clip arts are free, Cisco clip arts free but aganist for > alteration. Hmmm. You seem to not distinguish between free and free. I personally do not care about things that are free (as in free beer) and their license prohibits me to change them. Such work is useless for me and also for OOo. I do not like many things on your XXX Premium. I even consider it as unfair to name something as SomethingElse Premium (which in fact is my primary reason I won't look at it at all). For very similar example, have a look at http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63805 This issue is about including some kind of fonts into OOo. It is impossible, because these fonts are non-free. But what we could include is a generic framework for new font sets inclusion. And we can even include some free (and license compatible!) fontsets into our (I'm working on OpenOffice.org) product. This is what I expect from your work on your OOo distribution. Are you going this way or you simply bundle everything you have/downloaded from all around the world into it? Such project is useless in my opinion. Providing framework to include all these extras file into the running product and/or into the instset is worth the effort. Simple/manual bundling of everything into it is not. -- Pavel Janík This doesn't mean you should mix false(1) and true(1) editors. -- Ole Aamot in alt.religion.emacs --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
