Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thorsten Behrens wrote: >> Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>>> - - using non-free libraries like gpc >>>> (thankfully now avoidable by --disable-gpc and using basegfxs stuff) >>>> >>> This is indeed ugly. Could basegfxs replace gpc completely? >>> >> This is mostly a question of test coverage. Functionality-wise, it's >> > You mean, we do not know what we may break, do we? > >> clearly possible. >> > Would it be reasonable to do it in one of the next updates? > It's easily possible, no problem - but what would that (in isolation) buy us? After all, it's configurable anyway...
Shouldn't we turn the switch just after all the other roadblocks (for a unified OOo build) are out of the way? Cheers, -- Thorsten If you're not failing some of the time, you're not trying hard enough. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
