Hi,
please correct me, if I am wrong. I understand this as a 'C' inherited
C++ oddity (no constructors for integral values), which leads to a
warning if the first operation on the integral value is not classified
as "assignment". Obviously 'operator >>=' has not been classified as
"assignment" at least not for the right operand.
So, it seems that we have used the wrong operator here. Therefor I tend
to agree to Frank, that we may want to fix this.
Kay
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Nonetheless, I would not consider initializing b with something
meaningful a mutilation. And be it just because months later, somebody
will be tempted to re-use b some lines below.
Ciao
Frank
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
