Hi,
Michael Meeks wrote:
The traditional way to solve this is to have a responsive maintainer
that approves (and/or rejects - with suitable comments) changes to the
icon set.
Yes. That would be the idea Martin posted.
It's also normal in such a situation for some received wisdom such as
choice of palette, constraints etc. to get communicated clearly.
Obviously having a guiding vision behind a coherent set of icons is
great, but having lots of people working on a set is good too ;-) so
far, there has been no useful collaboration / communication whatever
from the outside with the Sun art team [1], fixing that situation is
clearly vital.
Yes. But we have to differentiate between working on new concepts for
displaying icons (such as svg, different sizes, different palettes,
etc.) and the daily work on the current set.
IMHO if the use of this web tool causes pain, and is unusable by
others, Sun should shoulder the burden here; and ultimately [ AFAIR ]
good icons take ~3 hours each to draw ; [ in 2 sizes ], and as such it's
unlikely that inserting 4 or 5 per day in some web tool is going to
cause much grief :-)
Correct. Still the tool should be open and viewable for everybody. We
are working on that.
Can you make sure this is clearly defined in the wiki ? also - when sts
goes on vacation etc. is there somewhere else they can be CC'd (which
will usefully preserve timestamps etc.)
I guess the standard procedures should be used, if a maintainer is not
available.
Cheers,
Tom.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
