From technical perspective there seem to be no difference between
milestone and step anymore,
Martin
Pavel JanÃk wrote:
From: Martin Hollmichel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 15:51:44 +0200
> "Issues should always be fixed on the next milestones",
I agree with this.
But an idea: in the past we have seen several step milestones as well. So
if the issue is critical enough, can't we just make *new* (next) "step"
milestone with only the critical fix added and make it available faster
than usual?
This can fix the "We have to wait a week for fixed milestone" reply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
